Guyanese vs American Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Guyanese
American
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Guyanese
Americans
19.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
257th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
241st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guyanese vs American Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 175,189,173 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Guyanese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.107 and weighted average of 19.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 557,572,763 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Americans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.641 and weighted average of 18.8%, a difference of 3.2%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Guyanese | American |
Minimum | 1.7% | 3.7% |
Maximum | 34.8% | 100.0% |
Range | 33.1% | 96.3% |
Mean | 18.0% | 34.4% |
Median | 17.2% | 26.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.1% | 20.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.1% | 36.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 16.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 21.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.5% | 21.9% |
Demographics Similar to Guyanese and Americans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Guyanese are Salvadoran (19.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Ottawa (19.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (19.3%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Ecuador (19.3%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Western Africa (19.3%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Americans are Immigrants from Cuba (18.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Nigerian (18.7%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (18.8%, a difference of 0.36%), Ecuadorian (18.8%, a difference of 0.43%), and Marshallese (18.7%, a difference of 0.47%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Marshallese | 0.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 18.7% |
Nigerians | 0.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 18.7% |
Americans | 0.8 /100 | #241 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.7 /100 | #243 | Tragic 18.8% |
Ecuadorians | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 18.8% |
Shoshone | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 18.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 18.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 18.9% |
French American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 19.2% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 19.2% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 19.2% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 19.2% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 19.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 19.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 19.3% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 19.3% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 19.3% |
Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 19.4% |
Salvadorans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.4% |