French American Indian vs Immigrants from Sudan Female Poverty
COMPARE
French American Indian
Immigrants from Sudan
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
French American Indians
Immigrants from Sudan
15.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
237th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
241st/ 347
METRIC RANK
French American Indian vs Immigrants from Sudan Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,968,938 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.595 and weighted average of 15.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,954,745 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sudan and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.311 and weighted average of 15.2%, a difference of 0.90%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | French American Indian | Immigrants from Sudan |
| Minimum | 0.16% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 40.0% | 43.0% |
| Range | 39.8% | 41.3% |
| Mean | 17.2% | 15.7% |
| Median | 16.2% | 14.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.8% | 10.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.6% | 18.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 7.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.5% | 8.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 8.1% |
Demographics Similar to French American Indians and Immigrants from Sudan by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to French American Indians are Immigrants from Armenia (15.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Cree (15.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (15.2%, a difference of 0.59%), Sudanese (15.2%, a difference of 0.65%), and Immigrants from Laos (15.0%, a difference of 0.82%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sudan are Nepalese (15.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Sudanese (15.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (15.2%, a difference of 0.30%), Nicaraguan (15.3%, a difference of 0.36%), and Ecuadorian (15.3%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Ghanaians | 1.9 /100 | #229 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Alaska Natives | 1.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Nigerians | 1.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Osage | 1.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 1.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Cree | 0.7 /100 | #236 | Tragic 15.1% |
| French American Indians | 0.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |