Danish vs Colombian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Danish
Colombian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Danes
Colombians
13.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
76.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Danish vs Colombian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 460,459,007 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.581 and weighted average of 13.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 411,792,249 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Colombians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.267 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 16.3%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Danish | Colombian |
| Minimum | 0.79% | 3.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 58.6% |
| Range | 99.2% | 55.5% |
| Mean | 23.1% | 15.7% |
| Median | 14.1% | 14.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.5% | 12.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.7% | 17.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.2% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.5% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.3% | 7.3% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Danes by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Swedish (13.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Turkish (13.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Maltese (13.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Asian (13.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.83%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Russians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Demographics Similar to Colombians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Colombians are Immigrants from Fiji (15.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Syrian (15.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Chile (15.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Guamanian/Chamorro (15.9%, a difference of 0.12%), and Slovak (15.9%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Albania | 80.7 /100 | #150 | Excellent 15.8% |
| Venezuelans | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 79.4 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 78.5 /100 | #153 | Good 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
| Syrians | 76.7 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 76.1 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
| Colombians | 76.1 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 75.3 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |
| Slovaks | 75.2 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
| French | 72.8 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 72.0 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
| French Canadians | 68.7 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 68.4 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 67.8 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |