Czech vs Bhutanese Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years

On this page

Metric Comparison Correlation Chart Correlation Data Summary Similar Demographics Czechs Bhutanese

COMPARE

Czech

Race

Asian Black/African American Hawaiian Hispanic or Latino Native/Alaskan White/Caucasian

Ancestry

Afghan African Alaska Native Alaskan Athabascan Albanian Aleut Alsatian American Apache Arab Arapaho Argentinean Armenian Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Australian Austrian Bahamian Bangladeshi Barbadian Basque Belgian Belizean Bermudan Blackfeet Bolivian Brazilian British British West Indian Bulgarian Burmese Cajun Cambodian Canadian Cape Verdean Carpatho Rusyn Celtic Central American Central American Indian Cherokee Cheyenne Chickasaw Chilean Chinese Chippewa Choctaw Colombian Colville Comanche Costa Rican Cree Creek Croatian Crow Cuban CypriotCzechCzechoslovakian Danish Delaware Dominican Dutch Dutch West Indian Eastern European Ecuadorian Egyptian English Estonian Ethiopian European Fijian Filipino Finnish French French American Indian French Canadian German German Russian Ghanaian Greek Guamanian/Chamorro Guatemalan Guyanese Haitian Hmong Honduran Hopi Houma Hungarian Icelander Indian (Asian)Indonesian Inupiat Iranian Iraqi Irish Iroquois Israeli Italian Jamaican Japanese Jordanian Kenyan Kiowa Korean Laotian Latvian Lebanese Liberian Lithuanian Lumbee Luxembourger Macedonian Malaysian Maltese Marshallese Menominee Mexican Mexican American Indian Mongolian Moroccan Native Hawaiian Navajo Nepalese New Zealander Nicaraguan Nigerian Northern European Norwegian Okinawan Osage Ottawa Paiute Pakistani Palestinian Panamanian Paraguayan Pennsylvania German Peruvian Pima Polish Portuguese Potawatomi Pueblo Puerto Rican Puget Sound Salish Romanian Russian Salvadoran Samoan Scandinavian Scotch-Irish Scottish Seminole Senegalese Serbian Shoshone Sierra Leonean Sioux Slavic Slovak Slovene Somali South African South American South American Indian Soviet Union Spaniard Spanish Spanish American Spanish American Indian Sri Lankan Subsaharan African Sudanese Swedish Swiss Syrian Taiwanese Thai Tlingit-Haida Tohono O'Odham Tongan Trinidadian and Tobagonian Tsimshian Turkish U.S. Virgin Islander Ugandan Ukrainian Uruguayan Ute Venezuelan Vietnamese Welsh West Indian Yakama Yaqui Yugoslavian Yuman Yup'ik Zimbabwean

Immigration

Nonimmigrants Immigrants Afghanistan Africa Albania Argentina Armenia Asia Australia Austria Bahamas Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Brazil Bulgaria Burma/Myanmar Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Canada Caribbean Central America Chile China Colombia Congo Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Czechoslovakia Denmark Dominica Dominican Republic Eastern Africa Eastern Asia Eastern Europe Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Eritrea Ethiopia Europe Fiji France Germany Ghana Greece Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Hong Kong Hungary India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Korea Kuwait Laos Latin America Latvia Lebanon Liberia Lithuania Malaysia Mexico Micronesia Middle Africa Moldova Morocco Nepal Netherlands Nicaragua Nigeria North America North Macedonia Northern Africa Northern Europe Norway Oceania Pakistan Panama Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Romania Russia Saudi Arabia Scotland Senegal Serbia Sierra Leone Singapore Somalia South Africa South America South Central Asia South Eastern Asia Southern Europe Spain Sri Lanka St. Vincent and the Grenadines Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Thailand Trinidad and Tobago Turkey Uganda Ukraine Uruguay Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Indies Western Africa Western Asia Western Europe Yemen Zaire Zimbabwe Azores

Bhutanese

Race

Asian Black/African American Hawaiian Hispanic or Latino Native/Alaskan White/Caucasian

Ancestry

Afghan African Alaska Native Alaskan Athabascan Albanian Aleut Alsatian American Apache Arab Arapaho Argentinean Armenian Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Australian Austrian Bahamian Bangladeshi Barbadian Basque Belgian Belizean BermudanBhutaneseBlackfeet Bolivian Brazilian British British West Indian Bulgarian Burmese Cajun Cambodian Canadian Cape Verdean Carpatho Rusyn Celtic Central American Central American Indian Cherokee Cheyenne Chickasaw Chilean Chinese Chippewa Choctaw Colombian Colville Comanche Costa Rican Cree Creek Croatian Crow Cuban Cypriot Czechoslovakian Danish Delaware Dominican Dutch Dutch West Indian Eastern European Ecuadorian Egyptian English Estonian Ethiopian European Fijian Filipino Finnish French French American Indian French Canadian German German Russian Ghanaian Greek Guamanian/Chamorro Guatemalan Guyanese Haitian Hmong Honduran Hopi Houma Hungarian Icelander Indian (Asian)Indonesian Inupiat Iranian Iraqi Irish Iroquois Israeli Italian Jamaican Japanese Jordanian Kenyan Kiowa Korean Laotian Latvian Lebanese Liberian Lithuanian Lumbee Luxembourger Macedonian Malaysian Maltese Marshallese Menominee Mexican Mexican American Indian Mongolian Moroccan Native Hawaiian Navajo Nepalese New Zealander Nicaraguan Nigerian Northern European Norwegian Okinawan Osage Ottawa Paiute Pakistani Palestinian Panamanian Paraguayan Pennsylvania German Peruvian Pima Polish Portuguese Potawatomi Pueblo Puerto Rican Puget Sound Salish Romanian Russian Salvadoran Samoan Scandinavian Scotch-Irish Scottish Seminole Senegalese Serbian Shoshone Sierra Leonean Sioux Slavic Slovak Slovene Somali South African South American South American Indian Soviet Union Spaniard Spanish Spanish American Spanish American Indian Sri Lankan Subsaharan African Sudanese Swedish Swiss Syrian Taiwanese Thai Tlingit-Haida Tohono O'Odham Tongan Trinidadian and Tobagonian Tsimshian Turkish U.S. Virgin Islander Ugandan Ukrainian Uruguayan Ute Venezuelan Vietnamese Welsh West Indian Yakama Yaqui Yugoslavian Yuman Yup'ik Zimbabwean

Immigration

Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years

Social Comparison

Income

Per Capita Income Median Family Income Median Household Income Median Earnings Median Male Earnings Median Female Earnings Householder Income Under 25 years Householder Income Ages 25 - 44 yearsHouseholder Income Ages 45 - 64 yearsHouseholder Income Over 65 years Wage/Income Gap

Poverty

Poverty Family Poverty Male Poverty Female Poverty Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Single Male Poverty Single Female Poverty Single Father Poverty Single Mother Poverty Married-Couple Family Poverty Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Receiving Food Stamps

Unemployment

Labor Participation

Family Structure

Family Households Family Households with Children Married-couple Households Average Family Size Single Father Households Single Mother Households Currently Married Divorced or Separated Births to Unmarried Women

Vehicle Availability

No Vehicles in Household 1 or more Vehicles in Household 2 or more Vehicles in Household 3 or more Vehicles in Household 4 or more Vehicles in Household

Education Level

No Schooling Completed Nursery School Kindergarten 1st Grade 2nd Grade 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade 12th Grade, No Diploma High School Diploma GED/Equivalency College, Under 1 year College, 1 year or more Associate's Degree Bachelor's Degree Master's Degree Professional Degree Doctorate Degree

Disability

Disability Male Disability Female Disability Disability Age Under 5 Disability Age 5 to 17 Disability Age 18 to 34 Disability Age 35 to 64 Disability Age 65 to 74 Disability Age Over 75 Vision Disability Hearing Disability Cognitive Disability Ambulatory Disability Self-Care Disability

Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years Comparison

Czechs

Bhutanese

Excellent

Exceptional

$103,507

HOUSEHOLDER INCOME AGES 45 - 64 YEARS

83.1/ 100

METRIC RATING

144th/ 347

METRIC RANK

$117,750

HOUSEHOLDER INCOME AGES 45 - 64 YEARS

100.0/ 100

METRIC RATING

29th/ 347

METRIC RANK

Czech vs Bhutanese Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years Correlation Chart

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 483,421,339 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Czechs and household income with householder between the ages 45 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.154 and weighted average of $103,507. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,365,624 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and household income with householder between the ages 45 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.002 and weighted average of $117,750, a difference of 13.8%.

Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Czech	Bhutanese
Minimum	$41,250	$62,115
Maximum	$134,167	$199,389
Range	$92,917	$137,274
Mean	$90,131	$121,425
Median	$91,354	$120,522
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	$78,110	$98,623
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	$101,246	$140,769
Interquartile Range (IQR)	$23,136	$42,146
Standard Deviation (Sample)	$16,799	$28,538
Standard Deviation (Population)	$16,726	$28,402

Similar Demographics by Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years

Demographics Similar to Czechs by Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years

In terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Serbian ($103,522, a difference of 0.010%), Luxembourger ($103,536, a difference of 0.030%), Ugandan ($103,472, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Uganda ($103,584, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Chile ($103,412, a difference of 0.090%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years
Hungarians	85.8 /100 \| #137	Excellent $103,913
Ethiopians	84.7 /100 \| #138	Excellent $103,736
Immigrants \| Oceania	84.5 /100 \| #139	Excellent $103,705
Norwegians	84.3 /100 \| #140	Excellent $103,682
Immigrants \| Uganda	83.7 /100 \| #141	Excellent $103,584
Luxembourgers	83.3 /100 \| #142	Excellent $103,536
Serbians	83.2 /100 \| #143	Excellent $103,522
Czechs	83.1 /100 \| #144	Excellent $103,507
Ugandans	82.9 /100 \| #145	Excellent $103,472
Immigrants \| Chile	82.5 /100 \| #146	Excellent $103,412
Basques	82.3 /100 \| #147	Excellent $103,387
Immigrants \| Germany	81.5 /100 \| #148	Excellent $103,282
Immigrants \| Sierra Leone	81.1 /100 \| #149	Excellent $103,227
Immigrants \| Peru	80.7 /100 \| #150	Excellent $103,173
Swiss	79.9 /100 \| #151	Good $103,071

Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years

In terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Bolivia ($117,731, a difference of 0.020%), Turkish ($117,814, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Northern Europe ($117,930, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Sweden ($118,318, a difference of 0.48%), and Asian ($118,426, a difference of 0.57%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years
Immigrants \| Belgium	100.0 /100 \| #22	Exceptional $118,932
Bolivians	100.0 /100 \| #23	Exceptional $118,871
Immigrants \| Japan	100.0 /100 \| #24	Exceptional $118,498
Asians	100.0 /100 \| #25	Exceptional $118,426
Immigrants \| Sweden	100.0 /100 \| #26	Exceptional $118,318
Immigrants \| Northern Europe	100.0 /100 \| #27	Exceptional $117,930
Turks	100.0 /100 \| #28	Exceptional $117,814
Bhutanese	100.0 /100 \| #29	Exceptional $117,750
Immigrants \| Bolivia	100.0 /100 \| #30	Exceptional $117,731
Immigrants \| Asia	100.0 /100 \| #31	Exceptional $116,566
Russians	100.0 /100 \| #32	Exceptional $116,328
Chinese	100.0 /100 \| #33	Exceptional $116,156
Immigrants \| Denmark	100.0 /100 \| #34	Exceptional $116,000
Latvians	100.0 /100 \| #35	Exceptional $115,957
Immigrants \| Switzerland	100.0 /100 \| #36	Exceptional $115,934