Croatian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Family Poverty
COMPARE
Croatian
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Croatians
Immigrants from South Central Asia
7.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
24th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Croatian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 374,582,342 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Croatians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.422 and weighted average of 7.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 471,025,257 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.489 and weighted average of 7.2%, a difference of 1.7%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Croatian | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
Minimum | 1.8% | 0.60% |
Maximum | 28.1% | 15.8% |
Range | 26.3% | 15.2% |
Mean | 8.9% | 5.4% |
Median | 6.8% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 3.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.2% | 6.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Croatians and Immigrants from South Central Asia by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Burmese (7.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Cypriot (7.3%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Scotland (7.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (7.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and Danish (7.3%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia are Luxembourger (7.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Lithuania (7.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Lithuanian (7.2%, a difference of 0.27%), Eastern European (7.2%, a difference of 0.54%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (7.3%, a difference of 0.70%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Italians | 99.6 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 7.4% |