Comanche vs Vietnamese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Comanche
Vietnamese
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Comanche
Vietnamese
20.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
276th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
261st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Comanche vs Vietnamese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,392,517 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.166 and weighted average of 20.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 169,480,173 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Vietnamese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.407 and weighted average of 19.5%, a difference of 3.3%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Comanche | Vietnamese |
Minimum | 5.6% | 0.61% |
Maximum | 50.0% | 51.8% |
Range | 44.4% | 51.2% |
Mean | 26.3% | 20.1% |
Median | 22.5% | 17.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.9% | 13.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 38.2% | 25.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.3% | 11.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.7% | 11.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.5% | 11.3% |
Demographics Similar to Comanche and Vietnamese by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Belizean (20.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Barbadian (20.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Subsaharan African (20.1%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (20.1%, a difference of 0.46%), and Bangladeshi (20.0%, a difference of 0.89%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Vietnamese are Mexican American Indian (19.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Chickasaw (19.6%, a difference of 0.52%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (19.7%, a difference of 0.64%), Ottawa (19.4%, a difference of 0.67%), and Jamaican (19.7%, a difference of 0.76%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Salvadorans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.5% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.7% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.8% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.9% |
Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.9% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 20.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 20.0% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 20.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 20.1% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 20.2% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 20.2% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 20.2% |