Choctaw vs Somali Poverty
COMPARE
Choctaw
Somali
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Choctaw
Somalis
15.6%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
302nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw vs Somali Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,626,558 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.682 and weighted average of 15.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 99,289,063 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Somalis and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.782 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 1.2%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Choctaw | Somali |
| Minimum | 13.0% | 2.7% |
| Maximum | 58.1% | 51.5% |
| Range | 45.1% | 48.8% |
| Mean | 23.1% | 16.2% |
| Median | 20.5% | 13.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.5% | 11.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.1% | 17.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.6% | 8.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.6% | 8.5% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw and Somalis by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Seminole (15.6%, a difference of 0.040%), African (15.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Dutch West Indian (15.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Creek (15.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and Chippewa (15.7%, a difference of 0.52%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Somalis are Bahamian (15.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Central America (15.4%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Caribbean (15.5%, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Mexico (15.5%, a difference of 0.57%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (15.5%, a difference of 0.61%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 15.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 15.9% |