Chippewa vs Comanche Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chippewa
Comanche
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Chippewa
Comanche
16.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
302nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
285th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Comanche Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,995,312 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.544 and weighted average of 16.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,749,855 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.443 and weighted average of 16.2%, a difference of 3.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chippewa | Comanche |
| Minimum | 7.0% | 8.4% |
| Maximum | 78.4% | 60.0% |
| Range | 71.4% | 51.6% |
| Mean | 25.6% | 20.0% |
| Median | 20.4% | 17.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.3% | 14.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.2% | 23.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.8% | 9.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.1% | 10.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.0% | 10.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa and Comanche by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Guatemalan (16.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Bahamian (16.6%, a difference of 0.36%), Hispanic or Latino (16.6%, a difference of 0.40%), Choctaw (16.8%, a difference of 0.61%), and Somali (16.6%, a difference of 0.93%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Spanish American (16.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Cuba (16.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Inupiat (16.2%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from Belize (16.3%, a difference of 0.63%), and Indonesian (16.4%, a difference of 1.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |