Chinese vs Yugoslavian Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Chinese
Yugoslavian
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Chinese
Yugoslavians
9.8%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
63rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.7%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
92.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
129th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Yugoslavian Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,766,872 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.294 and weighted average of 9.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,227,567 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.037 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 9.6%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Yugoslavian |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 34.0% | 21.2% |
| Range | 32.5% | 18.9% |
| Mean | 11.5% | 9.2% |
| Median | 9.5% | 8.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.8% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.1% | 11.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.3% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Receiving Food Stamps
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Bulgaria (9.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from North America (9.8%, a difference of 0.090%), English (9.8%, a difference of 0.11%), German (9.7%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Turkey (9.8%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
| Immigrants | Canada | 99.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Greeks | 99.3 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Scandinavians | 99.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| British | 99.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Germans | 99.2 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| English | 99.2 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.2 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Chinese | 99.2 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | North America | 99.2 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.1 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Slovenes | 99.1 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.0 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.0 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Italians | 99.0 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.0 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Immigrants from Jordan (10.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (10.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Afghan (10.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Israeli (10.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and French (10.7%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
| Sri Lankans | 93.7 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 93.3 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Ukrainians | 92.8 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Afghans | 92.6 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 92.6 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 92.5 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Yugoslavians | 92.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Israelis | 92.4 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| French | 92.3 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 92.0 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 90.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 90.3 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Argentineans | 90.2 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Slovaks | 89.8 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |