Chinese vs Okinawan Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Chinese
Okinawan
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Chinese
Okinawans
11.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Okinawan Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,708,230 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.283 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,367,839 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Okinawans and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.028 and weighted average of 13.5%, a difference of 13.8%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Okinawan |
| Minimum | 0.70% | 0.64% |
| Maximum | 58.3% | 37.9% |
| Range | 57.6% | 37.3% |
| Mean | 14.1% | 11.5% |
| Median | 10.7% | 10.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.9% | 15.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.7% | 9.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.9% | 8.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.8% | 8.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Okinawans by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.3%, a difference of 3.3%), Iranian (12.4%, a difference of 4.9%), Immigrants from Singapore (12.5%, a difference of 5.2%), Immigrants from Iran (12.5%, a difference of 5.8%), and Bhutanese (12.6%, a difference of 6.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Okinawans are Immigrants from Lithuania (13.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Latvian (13.4%, a difference of 0.96%), Tongan (13.4%, a difference of 1.1%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and Indian (Asian) (13.3%, a difference of 1.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.2% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.2% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Okinawans | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.5% |