Central American Indian vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,772,656 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.454 and weighted average of 16.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,161,446 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.241 and weighted average of 16.5%, a difference of 0.050%.

Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Central American Indian	Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Minimum	6.9%	0.17%
Maximum	100.0%	42.8%
Range	93.1%	42.6%
Mean	31.1%	14.8%
Median	22.4%	11.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	16.4%	9.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	43.5%	19.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	27.1%	9.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	20.1%	9.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	20.0%	9.1%

Demographics Similar to Central American Indians and Immigrants from Uzbekistan by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75

In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Immigrants from Barbados (16.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Haiti (16.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Yemen (16.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Nicaraguan (16.6%, a difference of 0.43%), and Pueblo (16.7%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan are Immigrants from Barbados (16.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Haiti (16.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Yemen (16.5%, a difference of 0.35%), Nicaraguan (16.6%, a difference of 0.38%), and Pueblo (16.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
Barbadians	0.0 /100 \| #313	Tragic 16.0%
Tsimshian	0.0 /100 \| #314	Tragic 16.1%
Guyanese	0.0 /100 \| #315	Tragic 16.1%
Immigrants \| Ecuador	0.0 /100 \| #316	Tragic 16.1%
Immigrants \| Guyana	0.0 /100 \| #317	Tragic 16.2%
Houma	0.0 /100 \| #318	Tragic 16.2%
Haitians	0.0 /100 \| #319	Tragic 16.2%
Immigrants \| Yemen	0.0 /100 \| #320	Tragic 16.5%
Immigrants \| Haiti	0.0 /100 \| #321	Tragic 16.5%
Immigrants \| Barbados	0.0 /100 \| #322	Tragic 16.5%
Central American Indians	0.0 /100 \| #323	Tragic 16.5%
Immigrants \| Uzbekistan	0.0 /100 \| #324	Tragic 16.5%
Nicaraguans	0.0 /100 \| #325	Tragic 16.6%
Pueblo	0.0 /100 \| #326	Tragic 16.7%
Sioux	0.0 /100 \| #327	Tragic 16.8%
Cape Verdeans	0.0 /100 \| #328	Tragic 16.8%
Immigrants \| Dominica	0.0 /100 \| #329	Tragic 17.0%
British West Indians	0.0 /100 \| #330	Tragic 17.4%
Immigrants \| Armenia	0.0 /100 \| #331	Tragic 17.5%
Immigrants \| St. Vincent and the Grenadines	0.0 /100 \| #332	Tragic 17.5%
Immigrants \| Nicaragua	0.0 /100 \| #333	Tragic 17.6%