Cape Verdean vs Immigrants from Jamaica Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,748,035 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.135 and weighted average of 19.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 297,997,980 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jamaica and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.139 and weighted average of 19.8%, a difference of 2.9%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Cape Verdean	Immigrants from Jamaica
Minimum	3.9%	1.5%
Maximum	45.2%	48.1%
Range	41.3%	46.6%
Mean	17.9%	19.2%
Median	17.9%	18.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	10.2%	14.9%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	24.5%	22.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	14.3%	7.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	8.9%	8.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	8.8%	8.2%

Demographics Similar to Cape Verdeans and Immigrants from Jamaica by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Cape Verdeans are Potawatomi (19.2%, a difference of 0.030%), French American Indian (19.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (19.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (19.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Guyana (19.3%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jamaica are Spanish American (19.8%, a difference of 0.25%), Jamaican (19.7%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (19.9%, a difference of 0.46%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (19.7%, a difference of 0.55%), and Chickasaw (19.6%, a difference of 0.67%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Ghana	0.5 /100 \| #247	Tragic 18.9%
French American Indians	0.3 /100 \| #248	Tragic 19.2%
Potawatomi	0.3 /100 \| #249	Tragic 19.2%
Cape Verdeans	0.3 /100 \| #250	Tragic 19.2%
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	0.3 /100 \| #251	Tragic 19.2%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	0.3 /100 \| #252	Tragic 19.2%
Immigrants \| Guyana	0.3 /100 \| #253	Tragic 19.3%
Immigrants \| Western Africa	0.3 /100 \| #254	Tragic 19.3%
Immigrants \| Ecuador	0.3 /100 \| #255	Tragic 19.3%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	0.2 /100 \| #256	Tragic 19.3%
Guyanese	0.2 /100 \| #257	Tragic 19.4%
Salvadorans	0.2 /100 \| #258	Tragic 19.4%
Ottawa	0.2 /100 \| #259	Tragic 19.4%
Mexican American Indians	0.2 /100 \| #260	Tragic 19.5%
Vietnamese	0.2 /100 \| #261	Tragic 19.5%
Chickasaw	0.1 /100 \| #262	Tragic 19.6%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	0.1 /100 \| #263	Tragic 19.7%
Jamaicans	0.1 /100 \| #264	Tragic 19.7%
Immigrants \| Jamaica	0.1 /100 \| #265	Tragic 19.8%
Spanish Americans	0.1 /100 \| #266	Tragic 19.8%
Immigrants \| Bangladesh	0.1 /100 \| #267	Tragic 19.9%