Burmese vs Czech Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Burmese
Czech
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Burmese
Czechs
8.6%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
8th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.2%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
28th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Czech Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 463,413,617 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.435 and weighted average of 8.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 482,652,589 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Czechs and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.183 and weighted average of 9.2%, a difference of 6.6%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Burmese | Czech |
| Minimum | 0.70% | 0.40% |
| Maximum | 63.5% | 38.7% |
| Range | 62.8% | 38.3% |
| Mean | 8.5% | 8.3% |
| Median | 6.1% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.5% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.4% | 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese and Czechs by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from Korea (8.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (8.8%, a difference of 2.1%), Okinawan (8.9%, a difference of 2.5%), Cypriot (8.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and Bulgarian (8.9%, a difference of 2.8%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Bhutanese (9.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Swedish (9.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Ireland (9.2%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (9.2%, a difference of 0.55%), and Eastern European (9.2%, a difference of 0.57%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 8.8% |
| Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Danes | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Czechs | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.2% |