Immigrants from Denmark vs Czech Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Immigrants from Denmark
Czech
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Immigrants from Denmark
Czechs
9.6%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
44th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.2%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
28th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Denmark vs Czech Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,213,097 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Denmark and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.165 and weighted average of 9.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 482,652,589 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Czechs and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.183 and weighted average of 9.2%, a difference of 4.3%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Denmark | Czech |
| Minimum | 0.68% | 0.40% |
| Maximum | 15.0% | 38.7% |
| Range | 14.3% | 38.3% |
| Mean | 7.4% | 8.3% |
| Median | 7.3% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.7% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Denmark and Czechs by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Denmark are Immigrants from Belgium (9.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Australian (9.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Croatian (9.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from China (9.6%, a difference of 0.53%), and Cambodian (9.5%, a difference of 0.78%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Bhutanese (9.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Swedish (9.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.2%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Sweden (9.3%, a difference of 0.64%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (9.3%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Czechs | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Turks | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Estonians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.5 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Cambodians | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 99.5 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Croatians | 99.5 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.4 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Australians | 99.4 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 9.6% |