Brazilian vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 25-29

On this page

Metric Comparison Correlation Chart Correlation Data Summary Similar Demographics Brazilians Chickasaw

COMPARE

Brazilian

Race

Asian Black/African American Hawaiian Hispanic or Latino Native/Alaskan White/Caucasian

Ancestry

Afghan African Alaska Native Alaskan Athabascan Albanian Aleut Alsatian American Apache Arab Arapaho Argentinean Armenian Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Australian Austrian Bahamian Bangladeshi Barbadian Basque Belgian Belizean Bermudan Bhutanese Blackfeet BolivianBrazilianBritish British West Indian Bulgarian Burmese Cajun Cambodian Canadian Cape Verdean Carpatho Rusyn Celtic Central American Central American Indian Cherokee Cheyenne Chilean Chinese Chippewa Choctaw Colombian Colville Comanche Costa Rican Cree Creek Croatian Crow Cuban Cypriot Czech Czechoslovakian Danish Delaware Dominican Dutch Dutch West Indian Eastern European Ecuadorian Egyptian English Estonian Ethiopian European Fijian Filipino Finnish French French American Indian French Canadian German German Russian Ghanaian Greek Guamanian/Chamorro Guatemalan Guyanese Haitian Hmong Honduran Hopi Houma Hungarian Icelander Indian (Asian)Indonesian Inupiat Iranian Iraqi Irish Iroquois Israeli Italian Jamaican Japanese Jordanian Kenyan Kiowa Korean Laotian Latvian Lebanese Liberian Lithuanian Lumbee Luxembourger Macedonian Malaysian Maltese Marshallese Menominee Mexican Mexican American Indian Mongolian Moroccan Native Hawaiian Navajo Nepalese New Zealander Nicaraguan Nigerian Northern European Norwegian Okinawan Osage Ottawa Paiute Pakistani Palestinian Panamanian Paraguayan Pennsylvania German Peruvian Pima Polish Portuguese Potawatomi Pueblo Puerto Rican Puget Sound Salish Romanian Russian Salvadoran Samoan Scandinavian Scotch-Irish Scottish Seminole Senegalese Serbian Shoshone Sierra Leonean Sioux Slavic Slovak Slovene Somali South African South American South American Indian Soviet Union Spaniard Spanish Spanish American Spanish American Indian Sri Lankan Subsaharan African Sudanese Swedish Swiss Syrian Taiwanese Thai Tlingit-Haida Tohono O'Odham Tongan Trinidadian and Tobagonian Tsimshian Turkish U.S. Virgin Islander Ugandan Ukrainian Uruguayan Ute Venezuelan Vietnamese Welsh West Indian Yakama Yaqui Yugoslavian Yuman Yup'ik Zimbabwean

Immigration

Nonimmigrants Immigrants Afghanistan Africa Albania Argentina Armenia Asia Australia Austria Bahamas Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Brazil Bulgaria Burma/Myanmar Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Canada Caribbean Central America Chile China Colombia Congo Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Czechoslovakia Denmark Dominica Dominican Republic Eastern Africa Eastern Asia Eastern Europe Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Eritrea Ethiopia Europe Fiji France Germany Ghana Greece Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Hong Kong Hungary India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Korea Kuwait Laos Latin America Latvia Lebanon Liberia Lithuania Malaysia Mexico Micronesia Middle Africa Moldova Morocco Nepal Netherlands Nicaragua Nigeria North America North Macedonia Northern Africa Northern Europe Norway Oceania Pakistan Panama Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Romania Russia Saudi Arabia Scotland Senegal Serbia Sierra Leone Singapore Somalia South Africa South America South Central Asia South Eastern Asia Southern Europe Spain Sri Lanka St. Vincent and the Grenadines Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Thailand Trinidad and Tobago Turkey Uganda Ukraine Uruguay Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Indies Western Africa Western Asia Western Europe Yemen Zaire Zimbabwe Azores

Chickasaw

Race

Asian Black/African American Hawaiian Hispanic or Latino Native/Alaskan White/Caucasian

Ancestry

Afghan African Alaska Native Alaskan Athabascan Albanian Aleut Alsatian American Apache Arab Arapaho Argentinean Armenian Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Australian Austrian Bahamian Bangladeshi Barbadian Basque Belgian Belizean Bermudan Bhutanese Blackfeet Bolivian British British West Indian Bulgarian Burmese Cajun Cambodian Canadian Cape Verdean Carpatho Rusyn Celtic Central American Central American Indian Cherokee CheyenneChickasawChilean Chinese Chippewa Choctaw Colombian Colville Comanche Costa Rican Cree Creek Croatian Crow Cuban Cypriot Czech Czechoslovakian Danish Delaware Dominican Dutch Dutch West Indian Eastern European Ecuadorian Egyptian English Estonian Ethiopian European Fijian Filipino Finnish French French American Indian French Canadian German German Russian Ghanaian Greek Guamanian/Chamorro Guatemalan Guyanese Haitian Hmong Honduran Hopi Houma Hungarian Icelander Indian (Asian)Indonesian Inupiat Iranian Iraqi Irish Iroquois Israeli Italian Jamaican Japanese Jordanian Kenyan Kiowa Korean Laotian Latvian Lebanese Liberian Lithuanian Lumbee Luxembourger Macedonian Malaysian Maltese Marshallese Menominee Mexican Mexican American Indian Mongolian Moroccan Native Hawaiian Navajo Nepalese New Zealander Nicaraguan Nigerian Northern European Norwegian Okinawan Osage Ottawa Paiute Pakistani Palestinian Panamanian Paraguayan Pennsylvania German Peruvian Pima Polish Portuguese Potawatomi Pueblo Puerto Rican Puget Sound Salish Romanian Russian Salvadoran Samoan Scandinavian Scotch-Irish Scottish Seminole Senegalese Serbian Shoshone Sierra Leonean Sioux Slavic Slovak Slovene Somali South African South American South American Indian Soviet Union Spaniard Spanish Spanish American Spanish American Indian Sri Lankan Subsaharan African Sudanese Swedish Swiss Syrian Taiwanese Thai Tlingit-Haida Tohono O'Odham Tongan Trinidadian and Tobagonian Tsimshian Turkish U.S. Virgin Islander Ugandan Ukrainian Uruguayan Ute Venezuelan Vietnamese Welsh West Indian Yakama Yaqui Yugoslavian Yuman Yup'ik Zimbabwean

Immigration

In Labor Force | Age 25-29

Social Comparison

Income

Per Capita Income Median Family Income Median Household Income Median Earnings Median Male Earnings Median Female Earnings Householder Income Under 25 years Householder Income Ages 25 - 44 years Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years Householder Income Over 65 years Wage/Income Gap

Poverty

Poverty Family Poverty Male Poverty Female Poverty Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Single Male Poverty Single Female Poverty Single Father Poverty Single Mother Poverty Married-Couple Family Poverty Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Receiving Food Stamps

Unemployment

Labor Participation

Family Structure

Family Households Family Households with Children Married-couple Households Average Family Size Single Father Households Single Mother Households Currently Married Divorced or Separated Births to Unmarried Women

Vehicle Availability

No Vehicles in Household 1 or more Vehicles in Household 2 or more Vehicles in Household 3 or more Vehicles in Household 4 or more Vehicles in Household

Education Level

No Schooling Completed Nursery School Kindergarten 1st Grade 2nd Grade 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade 12th Grade, No Diploma High School Diploma GED/Equivalency College, Under 1 year College, 1 year or more Associate's Degree Bachelor's Degree Master's Degree Professional Degree Doctorate Degree

Disability

Disability Male Disability Female Disability Disability Age Under 5 Disability Age 5 to 17 Disability Age 18 to 34 Disability Age 35 to 64 Disability Age 65 to 74 Disability Age Over 75 Vision Disability Hearing Disability Cognitive Disability Ambulatory Disability Self-Care Disability

In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Comparison

Brazilians

Chickasaw

Exceptional

Tragic

85.3%

IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29

98.3/ 100

METRIC RATING

75th/ 347

METRIC RANK

81.9%

IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29

0.0/ 100

METRIC RATING

317th/ 347

METRIC RANK

Brazilian vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Chart

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,871,107 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.031 and weighted average of 85.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,700,460 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.189 and weighted average of 81.9%, a difference of 4.2%.

In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Brazilian	Chickasaw
Minimum	42.3%	37.2%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	57.7%	62.8%
Mean	84.2%	79.6%
Median	85.8%	79.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	83.2%	74.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	88.4%	88.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.2%	14.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	10.8%	13.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	10.7%	13.4%

Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 25-29

Demographics Similar to Brazilians by In Labor Force | Age 25-29

In terms of in labor force | age 25-29, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are German (85.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Soviet Union (85.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (85.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Egypt (85.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (85.2%, a difference of 0.060%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 25-29
Immigrants \| Cameroon	99.2 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 85.4%
Menominee	99.1 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 85.4%
Immigrants \| Sweden	99.1 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 85.4%
Kenyans	99.0 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 85.4%
Immigrants \| Australia	98.9 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 85.3%
Russians	98.8 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 85.3%
Soviet Union	98.5 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 85.3%
Brazilians	98.3 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 85.3%
Germans	98.1 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 85.3%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	97.9 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 85.2%
Immigrants \| Egypt	97.7 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 85.2%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	97.6 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 85.2%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	97.6 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 85.2%
Immigrants \| Northern Europe	97.2 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 85.2%
Okinawans	97.0 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 85.2%

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by In Labor Force | Age 25-29

In terms of in labor force | age 25-29, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Comanche (81.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Mexican (81.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Mexico (82.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Seminole (81.7%, a difference of 0.23%), and Colville (81.6%, a difference of 0.28%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 25-29
Osage	0.0 /100 \| #310	Tragic 82.3%
Alaskan Athabascans	0.0 /100 \| #311	Tragic 82.3%
Hispanics or Latinos	0.0 /100 \| #312	Tragic 82.2%
Yaqui	0.0 /100 \| #313	Tragic 82.2%
Cherokee	0.0 /100 \| #314	Tragic 82.1%
Immigrants \| Mexico	0.0 /100 \| #315	Tragic 82.0%
Mexicans	0.0 /100 \| #316	Tragic 81.9%
Chickasaw	0.0 /100 \| #317	Tragic 81.9%
Comanche	0.0 /100 \| #318	Tragic 81.9%
Seminole	0.0 /100 \| #319	Tragic 81.7%
Colville	0.0 /100 \| #320	Tragic 81.6%
Shoshone	0.0 /100 \| #321	Tragic 81.6%
Kiowa	0.0 /100 \| #322	Tragic 81.6%
Alaska Natives	0.0 /100 \| #323	Tragic 81.6%
Houma	0.0 /100 \| #324	Tragic 81.2%