Bolivian vs Maltese Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Bolivian
Maltese
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Bolivians
Maltese
11.2%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
23rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bolivian vs Maltese Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 171,550,226 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.258 and weighted average of 11.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,992,298 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.605 and weighted average of 11.3%, a difference of 0.22%.

Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bolivian | Maltese |
Minimum | 1.1% | 3.0% |
Maximum | 42.1% | 47.8% |
Range | 41.0% | 44.8% |
Mean | 11.9% | 16.8% |
Median | 11.1% | 10.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.2% | 9.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.5% | 20.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.3% | 11.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.7% | 13.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.6% | 13.1% |
Demographics Similar to Bolivians and Maltese by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Indian (Asian) (11.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Pakistan (11.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Asian (11.2%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Japan (11.3%, a difference of 0.55%), and Ethiopian (11.2%, a difference of 0.65%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Indian (Asian) (11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Japan (11.3%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Pakistan (11.2%, a difference of 0.43%), Asian (11.2%, a difference of 0.52%), and Ethiopian (11.2%, a difference of 0.87%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.4% |