Immigrants from India vs Choctaw Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from India
Choctaw
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Immigrants from India
Choctaw
11.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
301st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from India vs Choctaw Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 424,282,439 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from India and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.413 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,369,694 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.445 and weighted average of 21.1%, a difference of 91.8%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from India | Choctaw |
Minimum | 0.96% | 5.3% |
Maximum | 26.9% | 100.0% |
Range | 26.0% | 94.7% |
Mean | 7.7% | 33.5% |
Median | 6.9% | 26.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 21.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.8% | 33.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 12.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 21.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 21.3% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from India by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from India are Immigrants from Taiwan (11.3%, a difference of 2.6%), Filipino (11.4%, a difference of 3.5%), Tsimshian (11.5%, a difference of 4.1%), Thai (11.8%, a difference of 7.2%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.3%, a difference of 11.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Seminole (21.2%, a difference of 0.12%), British West Indian (21.3%, a difference of 0.57%), Indonesian (21.3%, a difference of 0.60%), Somali (21.0%, a difference of 0.62%), and Hispanic or Latino (21.0%, a difference of 0.93%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 20.7% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 20.7% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 20.7% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 20.8% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 20.9% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 21.0% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 21.0% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 21.1% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 21.2% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 21.3% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 21.3% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |