Asian vs Turkish Poverty
COMPARE
Asian
Turkish
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Asians
Turks
11.0%
POVERTY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
50th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
POVERTY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
45th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Asian vs Turkish Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 550,188,892 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Asians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.248 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,706,785 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.071 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 0.18%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Asian | Turkish |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 2.5% |
| Maximum | 31.8% | 20.5% |
| Range | 29.9% | 18.0% |
| Mean | 9.6% | 9.0% |
| Median | 9.6% | 8.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.6% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.0% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 3.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Asians and Turks by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Asians are Immigrants from Japan (11.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Slovene (11.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Romania (11.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Croatia (11.0%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Romania (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Slovene (11.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Japan (11.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Moldova (10.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Russians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.1 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Turks | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 98.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Asians | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.6 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.5 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Estonians | 98.2 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 11.1% |