Immigrants from Greece vs Turkish Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Greece
Turkish
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Greece
Turks
10.8%
POVERTY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
37th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
POVERTY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
45th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Greece vs Turkish Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,856,400 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Greece and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.571 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,706,785 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.071 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 1.2%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Greece | Turkish |
| Minimum | 0.19% | 2.5% |
| Maximum | 43.6% | 20.5% |
| Range | 43.4% | 18.0% |
| Mean | 9.7% | 9.0% |
| Median | 8.9% | 8.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.1% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 3.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Greece and Turks by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Greece are Czech (10.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Cypriot (10.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Pakistan (10.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Tongan (10.8%, a difference of 0.17%), and Russian (10.9%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Romania (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Slovene (11.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Japan (11.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and Asian (11.0%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Tongans | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Cypriots | 99.3 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Russians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.1 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Turks | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 98.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Asians | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 11.0% |