Alaskan Athabascan vs Sudanese Male Poverty
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Sudanese
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Sudanese
12.8%
MALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
243rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.8%
MALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
241st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Sudanese Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,812,962 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.515 and weighted average of 12.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,106,340 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.602 and weighted average of 12.8%, a difference of 0.20%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Sudanese |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 4.2% |
| Maximum | 72.7% | 40.1% |
| Range | 71.3% | 35.9% |
| Mean | 20.4% | 14.2% |
| Median | 14.5% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.8% | 15.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.0% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.4% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.2% | 7.6% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans and Sudanese by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Nepalese (12.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Tsimshian (12.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Liberian (12.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from El Salvador (12.8%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (12.7%, a difference of 0.56%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Nepalese (12.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Tsimshian (12.8%, a difference of 0.31%), Liberian (12.8%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (12.7%, a difference of 0.36%), and Ghanaian (12.7%, a difference of 0.63%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Nicaraguans | 0.6 /100 | #232 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Fijians | 0.6 /100 | #233 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #234 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.5 /100 | #235 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 0.4 /100 | #236 | Tragic 12.7% |
| French American Indians | 0.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.4 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Ghanaians | 0.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Tsimshian | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Liberians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |