Alaskan Athabascan vs Alsatian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Alsatian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Alsatians
12.8%
MALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
243rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.4%
MALE POVERTY
1.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
228th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Alsatian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,812,962 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.515 and weighted average of 12.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,673,926 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Alsatians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.404 and weighted average of 12.4%, a difference of 3.4%.

Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Alsatian |
Minimum | 1.4% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 72.7% | 15.0% |
Range | 71.3% | 12.9% |
Mean | 20.4% | 9.1% |
Median | 14.5% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 5.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.8% | 12.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.0% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.4% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.2% | 3.7% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans and Alsatians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Nepalese (12.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Tsimshian (12.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Liberian (12.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Sudanese (12.8%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (12.7%, a difference of 0.56%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alsatians are Alaska Native (12.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Cuban (12.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Nigerian (12.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Osage (12.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and Marshallese (12.5%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Osage | 1.5 /100 | #225 | Tragic 12.3% |
Nigerians | 1.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 12.3% |
Alaska Natives | 1.4 /100 | #227 | Tragic 12.4% |
Alsatians | 1.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 12.4% |
Cubans | 1.3 /100 | #229 | Tragic 12.4% |
Marshallese | 0.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 12.5% |
Salvadorans | 0.6 /100 | #231 | Tragic 12.6% |
Nicaraguans | 0.6 /100 | #232 | Tragic 12.6% |
Fijians | 0.6 /100 | #233 | Tragic 12.6% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #234 | Tragic 12.6% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.5 /100 | #235 | Tragic 12.6% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 0.4 /100 | #236 | Tragic 12.7% |
French American Indians | 0.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 12.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.4 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.7% |
Ghanaians | 0.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.7% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.7% |
Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.8% |
Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.8% |
Tsimshian | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.8% |
Liberians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.8% |