Afghan vs Jamaican Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Afghan
Jamaican
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Afghans
Jamaicans
16.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
62.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
172nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
264th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Afghan vs Jamaican Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,871,316 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Afghans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.507 and weighted average of 16.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 362,780,888 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.129 and weighted average of 19.7%, a difference of 21.2%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Afghan | Jamaican |
Minimum | 1.2% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 52.3% | 58.8% |
Range | 51.1% | 56.7% |
Mean | 17.5% | 20.6% |
Median | 15.3% | 19.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.0% | 15.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.0% | 23.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.0% | 8.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.0% | 8.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.0% | 8.8% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Afghans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Afghans are Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (16.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Costa Rican (16.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Venezuela (16.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Yugoslavian (16.2%, a difference of 0.26%), and Uruguayan (16.2%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Germany | 67.3 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |
South Americans | 67.2 /100 | #166 | Good 16.1% |
Uruguayans | 64.7 /100 | #167 | Good 16.2% |
Yugoslavians | 64.4 /100 | #168 | Good 16.2% |
Costa Ricans | 64.2 /100 | #169 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 64.2 /100 | #170 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 64.0 /100 | #171 | Good 16.2% |
Afghans | 62.3 /100 | #172 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | South America | 55.1 /100 | #173 | Average 16.4% |
Ethiopians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 16.5% |
Lebanese | 45.4 /100 | #175 | Average 16.6% |
Hungarians | 45.1 /100 | #176 | Average 16.6% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 44.1 /100 | #177 | Average 16.6% |
Whites/Caucasians | 43.6 /100 | #178 | Average 16.6% |
Hawaiians | 43.4 /100 | #179 | Average 16.6% |
Demographics Similar to Jamaicans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Jamaicans are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (19.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Chickasaw (19.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Jamaica (19.8%, a difference of 0.43%), Spanish American (19.8%, a difference of 0.68%), and Vietnamese (19.5%, a difference of 0.76%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 19.4% |
Salvadorans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.5% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.7% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.8% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.9% |
Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.9% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.9% |