Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Las Vegas, NV

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Walk to Work
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Las Vegas
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Las Vegas

22.6%
65.7%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Las Vegas Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Las Vegas, NV

Zip Code % Walk to Work vs State vs National
1. 89135 65.7% 35.1% (+30.6)#2 33.4% (+32.3)#468
2. 89129 63.4% 35.1% (+28.3)#3 33.4% (+30.0)#736
3. 89109 56.0% 35.1% (+20.9)#10 33.4% (+22.6)#2,593
4. 89142 54.2% 35.1% (+19.1)#13 33.4% (+20.8)#3,130
5. 89103 53.6% 35.1% (+18.5)#14 33.4% (+20.2)#3,276
6. 89141 52.0% 35.1% (+16.9)#17 33.4% (+18.6)#3,835
7. 89144 48.9% 35.1% (+13.8)#20 33.4% (+15.5)#4,948
8. 89178 48.1% 35.1% (+13.0)#22 33.4% (+14.7)#5,242
9. 89169 45.6% 35.1% (+10.5)#26 33.4% (+12.2)#6,175
10. 89118 44.8% 35.1% (+9.70)#31 33.4% (+11.4)#6,460
11. 89115 42.6% 35.1% (+7.50)#34 33.4% (+9.20)#7,286
12. 89104 41.7% 35.1% (+6.60)#38 33.4% (+8.30)#7,666
13. 89134 41.6% 35.1% (+6.50)#39 33.4% (+8.20)#7,708
14. 89120 40.0% 35.1% (+4.90)#44 33.4% (+6.60)#8,382
15. 89106 39.4% 35.1% (+4.30)#46 33.4% (+6.00)#8,632
16. 89156 38.3% 35.1% (+3.20)#48 33.4% (+4.90)#9,114
17. 89108 37.5% 35.1% (+2.40)#50 33.4% (+4.10)#9,431
18. 89148 36.3% 35.1% (+1.20)#53 33.4% (+2.90)#9,953
19. 89102 36.1% 35.1% (+1.000)#54 33.4% (+2.70)#10,031
20. 89101 35.7% 35.1% (+0.600)#56 33.4% (+2.30)#10,208
21. 89149 33.5% 35.1% (-1.60)#60 33.4% (+0.100)#11,156
22. 89107 32.4% 35.1% (-2.70)#62 33.4% (-1.000)#11,644
23. 89147 30.0% 35.1% (-5.10)#66 33.4% (-3.40)#12,582
24. 89139 29.7% 35.1% (-5.40)#69 33.4% (-3.70)#12,706
25. 89117 29.4% 35.1% (-5.70)#71 33.4% (-4.00)#12,831
26. 89123 29.2% 35.1% (-5.90)#72 33.4% (-4.20)#12,909
27. 89145 28.9% 35.1% (-6.20)#73 33.4% (-4.50)#12,998
28. 89110 28.8% 35.1% (-6.30)#74 33.4% (-4.60)#13,028
29. 89138 27.8% 35.1% (-7.30)#75 33.4% (-5.60)#13,410
30. 89128 27.6% 35.1% (-7.50)#77 33.4% (-5.80)#13,489
31. 89119 27.3% 35.1% (-7.80)#79 33.4% (-6.10)#13,606
32. 89131 26.6% 35.1% (-8.50)#80 33.4% (-6.80)#13,816
33. 89146 25.0% 35.1% (-10.1)#82 33.4% (-8.40)#14,266
34. 89122 24.9% 35.1% (-10.2)#83 33.4% (-8.50)#14,283
35. 89121 24.2% 35.1% (-10.9)#85 33.4% (-9.20)#14,518
36. 89183 23.8% 35.1% (-11.3)#86 33.4% (-9.60)#14,622
37. 89130 22.6% 35.1% (-12.5)#91 33.4% (-10.8)#15,064

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Las Vegas, NV?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Las Vegas, NV are:
#1
65.7%
#2
63.4%
#3
56.0%
#4
54.2%
#5
53.6%
#6
52.0%
#7
48.9%
#8
48.1%
#9
45.6%
#10
44.8%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Las Vegas, NV?
89135 has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Las Vegas, NV with 65.7%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Las Vegas, NV?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Las Vegas is 33.8%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Nevada?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Nevada is 35.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States is 33.4%.