Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Las Vegas, NV

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Single Female
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Las Vegas
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Las Vegas

6.1%
50.9%
Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Las Vegas Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Las Vegas, NV

Zip Code Single Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. 89109 50.9% 21.5% (+29.3)#10 24.1% (+26.8)#3,243
2. 89169 43.5% 21.5% (+22.0)#13 24.1% (+19.4)#4,805
3. 89101 41.7% 21.5% (+20.2)#14 24.1% (+17.6)#5,256
4. 89161 40.8% 21.5% (+19.3)#15 24.1% (+16.7)#5,519
5. 89115 39.9% 21.5% (+18.4)#17 24.1% (+15.8)#5,837
6. 89104 36.6% 21.5% (+15.1)#20 24.1% (+12.6)#6,827
7. 89110 35.9% 21.5% (+14.4)#21 24.1% (+11.8)#7,086
8. 89121 34.0% 21.5% (+12.5)#23 24.1% (+9.94)#7,774
9. 89102 33.6% 21.5% (+12.1)#24 24.1% (+9.53)#7,924
10. 89108 33.0% 21.5% (+11.5)#25 24.1% (+8.94)#8,253
11. 89106 31.0% 21.5% (+9.52)#29 24.1% (+6.96)#9,055
12. 89103 29.9% 21.5% (+8.33)#30 24.1% (+5.78)#9,616
13. 89145 28.6% 21.5% (+7.10)#32 24.1% (+4.54)#10,197
14. 89119 28.2% 21.5% (+6.68)#33 24.1% (+4.12)#10,442
15. 89146 25.5% 21.5% (+3.98)#42 24.1% (+1.42)#11,853
16. 89139 24.0% 21.5% (+2.49)#48 24.1% (-0.071)#12,667
17. 89124 24.0% 21.5% (+2.48)#49 24.1% (-0.076)#12,684
18. 89142 22.9% 21.5% (+1.39)#52 24.1% (-1.17)#13,330
19. 89156 21.8% 21.5% (+0.281)#53 24.1% (-2.28)#13,963
20. 89130 21.4% 21.5% (-0.083)#54 24.1% (-2.64)#14,139
21. 89122 21.2% 21.5% (-0.327)#55 24.1% (-2.89)#14,294
22. 89118 20.9% 21.5% (-0.591)#56 24.1% (-3.15)#14,422
23. 89120 20.4% 21.5% (-1.14)#59 24.1% (-3.70)#14,703
24. 89143 18.6% 21.5% (-2.95)#62 24.1% (-5.51)#15,751
25. 89107 18.3% 21.5% (-3.24)#64 24.1% (-5.80)#15,920
26. 89129 18.1% 21.5% (-3.38)#65 24.1% (-5.94)#16,034
27. 89148 16.6% 21.5% (-4.90)#70 24.1% (-7.46)#16,971
28. 89147 16.1% 21.5% (-5.46)#72 24.1% (-8.02)#17,234
29. 89149 15.9% 21.5% (-5.60)#73 24.1% (-8.16)#17,318
30. 89178 14.9% 21.5% (-6.65)#77 24.1% (-9.21)#17,954
31. 89135 13.9% 21.5% (-7.65)#82 24.1% (-10.2)#18,518
32. 89166 12.9% 21.5% (-8.60)#85 24.1% (-11.2)#19,071
33. 89113 12.7% 21.5% (-8.83)#87 24.1% (-11.4)#19,221
34. 89183 12.4% 21.5% (-9.07)#89 24.1% (-11.6)#19,391
35. 89134 12.0% 21.5% (-9.52)#91 24.1% (-12.1)#19,609
36. 89141 11.8% 21.5% (-9.70)#93 24.1% (-12.3)#19,722
37. 89179 11.1% 21.5% (-10.4)#94 24.1% (-13.0)#20,110
38. 89131 10.8% 21.5% (-10.7)#100 24.1% (-13.3)#20,331
39. 89144 10.6% 21.5% (-10.9)#102 24.1% (-13.4)#20,416
40. 89117 10.5% 21.5% (-11.0)#104 24.1% (-13.5)#20,467
41. 89128 9.7% 21.5% (-11.8)#106 24.1% (-14.4)#20,897
42. 89138 7.5% 21.5% (-14.0)#112 24.1% (-16.6)#22,013
43. 89123 6.1% 21.5% (-15.4)#114 24.1% (-17.9)#22,671

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Las Vegas, NV?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Las Vegas, NV are:
#1
50.9%
#2
43.5%
#3
41.7%
#4
40.8%
#5
39.9%
#6
36.6%
#7
35.9%
#8
34.0%
#9
33.6%
#10
33.0%
What zip code has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Las Vegas, NV?
89109 has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Las Vegas, NV with 50.9%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in Las Vegas, NV?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in Las Vegas is 24.3%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in Nevada?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in Nevada is 21.5%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States is 24.1%.