Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Las Vegas, NV

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Public Transit
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Las Vegas
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Las Vegas

24.1%
58.3%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Las Vegas Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Las Vegas, NV

Zip Code % Public Transit vs State vs National
1. 89134 58.3% 39.1% (+19.2)#2 38.5% (+19.8)#437
2. 89131 49.5% 39.1% (+10.4)#12 38.5% (+11.0)#1,593
3. 89113 46.3% 39.1% (+7.20)#15 38.5% (+7.80)#2,377
4. 89145 43.9% 39.1% (+4.80)#18 38.5% (+5.40)#3,017
5. 89117 43.3% 39.1% (+4.20)#20 38.5% (+4.80)#3,178
6. 89146 43.3% 39.1% (+4.20)#21 38.5% (+4.80)#3,193
7. 89103 43.2% 39.1% (+4.10)#22 38.5% (+4.70)#3,203
8. 89149 42.7% 39.1% (+3.60)#23 38.5% (+4.20)#3,342
9. 89128 42.1% 39.1% (+3.00)#25 38.5% (+3.60)#3,532
10. 89106 41.3% 39.1% (+2.20)#26 38.5% (+2.80)#3,756
11. 89120 41.2% 39.1% (+2.10)#27 38.5% (+2.70)#3,783
12. 89119 40.3% 39.1% (+1.20)#30 38.5% (+1.80)#4,081
13. 89123 39.8% 39.1% (+0.700)#31 38.5% (+1.30)#4,244
14. 89101 39.8% 39.1% (+0.700)#32 38.5% (+1.30)#4,249
15. 89104 39.2% 39.1% (+0.100)#35 38.5% (+0.700)#4,462
16. 89110 38.9% 39.1% (-0.200)#36 38.5% (+0.400)#4,526
17. 89143 38.6% 39.1% (-0.500)#37 38.5% (+0.100)#4,654
18. 89107 38.5% 39.1% (-0.600)#39 38.5% (=0.000)#4,675
19. 89102 38.4% 39.1% (-0.700)#40 38.5% (-0.100)#4,713
20. 89108 37.4% 39.1% (-1.70)#41 38.5% (-1.10)#4,984
21. 89139 36.6% 39.1% (-2.50)#43 38.5% (-1.90)#5,201
22. 89122 36.3% 39.1% (-2.80)#45 38.5% (-2.20)#5,295
23. 89156 36.3% 39.1% (-2.80)#46 38.5% (-2.20)#5,303
24. 89166 36.3% 39.1% (-2.80)#47 38.5% (-2.20)#5,308
25. 89118 36.2% 39.1% (-2.90)#48 38.5% (-2.30)#5,335
26. 89148 36.1% 39.1% (-3.00)#49 38.5% (-2.40)#5,353
27. 89169 36.0% 39.1% (-3.10)#50 38.5% (-2.50)#5,394
28. 89147 35.3% 39.1% (-3.80)#52 38.5% (-3.20)#5,602
29. 89115 34.9% 39.1% (-4.20)#54 38.5% (-3.60)#5,706
30. 89129 33.7% 39.1% (-5.40)#58 38.5% (-4.80)#6,028
31. 89109 32.9% 39.1% (-6.20)#60 38.5% (-5.60)#6,240
32. 89121 32.8% 39.1% (-6.30)#61 38.5% (-5.70)#6,244
33. 89135 28.0% 39.1% (-11.1)#66 38.5% (-10.5)#7,196
34. 89130 27.0% 39.1% (-12.1)#68 38.5% (-11.5)#7,321
35. 89144 25.9% 39.1% (-13.2)#72 38.5% (-12.6)#7,479
36. 89183 25.1% 39.1% (-14.0)#73 38.5% (-13.4)#7,567
37. 89142 24.1% 39.1% (-15.0)#74 38.5% (-14.4)#7,679

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Las Vegas, NV?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Las Vegas, NV are:
#1
58.3%
#2
49.5%
#3
46.3%
#4
43.9%
#5
43.3%
#6
43.3%
#7
43.2%
#8
42.7%
#9
42.1%
#10
41.3%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Las Vegas, NV?
89134 has the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Las Vegas, NV with 58.3%.
What is the Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Las Vegas, NV?
Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Las Vegas is 39.9%.
What is the Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Nevada?
Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Nevada is 39.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in the United States is 38.5%.