Yup'ik vs Lumbee In Labor Force | Age 20-64
COMPARE
Yup'ik
Lumbee
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Comparison
Yup'ik
Lumbee
73.2%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
70.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yup'ik vs Lumbee In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,964,003 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.258 and weighted average of 73.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,293,168 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.080 and weighted average of 70.6%, a difference of 3.6%.
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yup'ik | Lumbee |
Minimum | 33.3% | 40.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 84.0% |
Range | 66.7% | 43.7% |
Mean | 73.4% | 66.3% |
Median | 74.4% | 65.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 66.0% | 59.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 80.8% | 73.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.8% | 14.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.9% | 9.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.8% | 8.9% |
Demographics Similar to Yup'ik and Lumbee by In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Crow (73.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Puerto Rican (73.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Ute (73.7%, a difference of 0.63%), Apache (73.7%, a difference of 0.64%), and Houma (72.7%, a difference of 0.64%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Tohono O'odham (70.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Hopi (71.7%, a difference of 1.5%), Yuman (71.7%, a difference of 1.5%), Navajo (69.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and Pima (69.0%, a difference of 2.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 75.0% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 74.8% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 74.8% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 74.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 74.4% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 73.9% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 73.7% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 73.7% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 73.3% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 73.2% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 73.1% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 72.7% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 72.6% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 72.3% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 71.7% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 71.7% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 70.6% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 70.4% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 69.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 69.0% |