Yakama vs Immigrants from China In Labor Force | Age 16-19
COMPARE
Yakama
Immigrants from China
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Comparison
Yakama
Immigrants from China
36.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
66.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
31.1%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
325th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yakama vs Immigrants from China In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,894,194 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Yakama and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.223 and weighted average of 36.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,166,794 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.762 and weighted average of 31.1%, a difference of 18.5%.
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yakama | Immigrants from China |
Minimum | 7.9% | 8.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 41.3% |
Range | 92.1% | 33.0% |
Mean | 39.7% | 25.6% |
Median | 35.4% | 27.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 26.4% | 21.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 44.0% | 30.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.6% | 8.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.2% | 7.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.7% | 7.3% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Demographics Similar to Yakama by In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Immigrants from Western Africa (36.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Kuwait (36.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Bermudan (36.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Jordan (36.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and Arab (36.8%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 16-19 |
Ute | 75.7 /100 | #158 | Good 37.1% |
Yaqui | 74.4 /100 | #159 | Good 37.1% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 73.9 /100 | #160 | Good 37.0% |
Cambodians | 71.5 /100 | #161 | Good 37.0% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 69.5 /100 | #162 | Good 36.9% |
Bermudans | 69.3 /100 | #163 | Good 36.9% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 68.9 /100 | #164 | Good 36.9% |
Yakama | 66.9 /100 | #165 | Good 36.9% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 66.7 /100 | #166 | Good 36.9% |
Arabs | 63.6 /100 | #167 | Good 36.8% |
Palestinians | 63.1 /100 | #168 | Good 36.8% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 61.6 /100 | #169 | Good 36.8% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 60.5 /100 | #170 | Good 36.8% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 58.4 /100 | #171 | Average 36.7% |
South Africans | 58.3 /100 | #172 | Average 36.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Dominican (31.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (31.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Caribbean (31.2%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Taiwan (31.0%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Ecuador (31.0%, a difference of 0.40%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 16-19 |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 31.5% |
Soviet Union | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 31.4% |
Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 31.4% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 31.3% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 31.3% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 31.2% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 31.2% |
Immigrants | China | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 31.1% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 31.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 31.0% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 31.0% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 31.0% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 31.0% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 30.9% |
Immigrants | Israel | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 30.5% |