Immigrants from Caribbean vs Immigrants from China In Labor Force | Age 16-19
COMPARE
Immigrants from Caribbean
 Immigrants from China
 In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Comparison
Immigrants from Caribbean
Immigrants from China
31.2%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
31.1%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
325th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Caribbean vs Immigrants from China In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,967,505 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Caribbean and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.569 and weighted average of 31.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,166,794 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.762 and weighted average of 31.1%, a difference of 0.33%.
 
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Caribbean | Immigrants from China | 
| Minimum | 8.6% | 8.3% | 
| Maximum | 55.5% | 41.3% | 
| Range | 46.9% | 33.0% | 
| Mean | 29.4% | 25.6% | 
| Median | 29.6% | 27.2% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.8% | 21.3% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 35.0% | 30.2% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.1% | 8.8% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.2% | 7.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.2% | 7.3% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from China by In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Caribbean are Tohono O'odham (31.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Dominican (31.2%, a difference of 0.18%), West Indian (31.3%, a difference of 0.25%), Ecuadorian (31.4%, a difference of 0.48%), and Immigrants from Dominican Republic (31.1%, a difference of 0.53%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Dominican (31.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (31.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Taiwan (31.0%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Ecuador (31.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and Barbadian (31.0%, a difference of 0.43%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | 
| Cubans | 0.0 /100 | #314  | Tragic 31.8%  | 
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #315  | Tragic 31.7%  | 
| Filipinos | 0.0 /100 | #316  | Tragic 31.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.0 /100 | #317  | Tragic 31.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #318  | Tragic 31.5%  | 
| Soviet Union | 0.0 /100 | #319  | Tragic 31.4%  | 
| Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #320  | Tragic 31.4%  | 
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #321  | Tragic 31.3%  | 
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #322  | Tragic 31.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #323  | Tragic 31.2%  | 
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #324  | Tragic 31.2%  | 
| Immigrants | China | 0.0 /100 | #325  | Tragic 31.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #326  | Tragic 31.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 0.0 /100 | #327  | Tragic 31.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #328  | Tragic 31.0%  | 
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #329  | Tragic 31.0%  | 
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #330  | Tragic 31.0%  | 
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.0 /100 | #331  | Tragic 30.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Israel | 0.0 /100 | #332  | Tragic 30.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 0.0 /100 | #333  | Tragic 30.5%  | 
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #334  | Tragic 30.3%  |