Swedish vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia In Labor Force | Age 25-29

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 538,345,964 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.553 and weighted average of 85.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,420,999 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.310 and weighted average of 85.4%, a difference of 0.22%.

In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Swedish	Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Minimum	73.1%	52.9%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	26.9%	47.1%
Mean	90.1%	88.8%
Median	88.2%	87.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	85.6%	84.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	99.4%	100.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	13.8%	15.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.3%	10.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.2%	10.1%

Demographics Similar to Swedes and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by In Labor Force | Age 25-29

In terms of in labor force | age 25-29, the demographic groups most similar to Swedes are Italian (85.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Turkish (85.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Yugoslavian (85.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Latvia (85.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Poland (85.6%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Immigrants from Italy (85.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Scotland (85.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Turkey (85.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Taiwanese (85.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Kenya (85.4%, a difference of 0.030%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 25-29
Turks	99.8 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 85.6%
Italians	99.8 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 85.6%
Swedes	99.8 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 85.6%
Yugoslavians	99.8 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| Latvia	99.8 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| Poland	99.7 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 85.6%
Belgians	99.7 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 85.5%
Albanians	99.7 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 85.5%
Immigrants \| Brazil	99.7 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 85.5%
Eastern Europeans	99.6 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 85.5%
Estonians	99.6 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 85.5%
Greeks	99.6 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 85.5%
Immigrants \| Morocco	99.5 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 85.5%
Thais	99.5 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 85.5%
Serbians	99.5 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 85.5%
Taiwanese	99.4 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 85.4%
Immigrants \| Kenya	99.4 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 85.4%
Immigrants \| Italy	99.3 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 85.4%
Immigrants \| Czechoslovakia	99.3 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 85.4%
Immigrants \| Scotland	99.3 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 85.4%
Immigrants \| Turkey	99.2 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 85.4%