Pima vs Houma In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Pima
Houma
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Comparison
Pima
Houma
74.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
79.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
331st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Houma In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,535,254 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Pima and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.046 and weighted average of 74.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,793,405 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Houma and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.076 and weighted average of 79.5%, a difference of 6.2%.
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pima | Houma |
Minimum | 9.3% | 52.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 97.6% |
Range | 90.7% | 45.6% |
Mean | 73.8% | 78.8% |
Median | 78.3% | 80.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 65.4% | 72.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 83.7% | 83.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.4% | 11.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.7% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.3% | 8.8% |
Demographics Similar to Pima and Houma by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Yuman (74.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Tohono O'odham (74.1%, a difference of 0.96%), Navajo (73.8%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Yemen (76.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and Crow (76.5%, a difference of 2.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Cheyenne (79.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Ute (79.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Menominee (79.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Kiowa (79.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and Creek (80.0%, a difference of 0.66%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 80.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.0% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 79.7% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 79.5% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.5% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.4% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 78.9% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 78.1% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 77.9% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 77.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 77.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 77.0% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 77.0% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 76.5% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 76.3% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 74.8% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 74.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 74.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 73.8% |