Immigrants from Sweden vs Dutch West Indian In Labor Force | Age 16-19

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,543,738 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sweden and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.111 and weighted average of 35.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,687,209 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Dutch West Indians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.412 and weighted average of 35.6%, a difference of 0.86%.

In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Sweden	Dutch West Indian
Minimum	19.1%	5.9%
Maximum	81.0%	100.0%
Range	61.9%	94.1%
Mean	38.8%	41.7%
Median	36.1%	34.6%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	34.0%	29.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	41.0%	43.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	7.0%	14.3%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	11.5%	25.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	11.2%	24.8%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sweden and Dutch West Indians by In Labor Force | Age 16-19

In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sweden are Immigrants from Norway (35.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (35.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Alsatian (35.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Senegalese (35.9%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Nigeria (35.8%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Dutch West Indians are Immigrants from Costa Rica (35.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (35.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Apache (35.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Houma (35.6%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Bolivia (35.6%, a difference of 0.050%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 16-19
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	19.9 /100 \| #198	Poor 35.9%
Immigrants \| Norway	19.8 /100 \| #199	Poor 35.9%
Immigrants \| Sweden	18.8 /100 \| #200	Poor 35.9%
Alsatians	17.5 /100 \| #201	Poor 35.9%
Senegalese	17.4 /100 \| #202	Poor 35.9%
Immigrants \| Nigeria	16.8 /100 \| #203	Poor 35.8%
Immigrants \| Albania	15.0 /100 \| #204	Poor 35.8%
South American Indians	14.6 /100 \| #205	Poor 35.8%
Chileans	14.6 /100 \| #206	Poor 35.8%
Immigrants \| Eastern Europe	14.5 /100 \| #207	Poor 35.8%
Koreans	13.3 /100 \| #208	Poor 35.7%
Moroccans	12.7 /100 \| #209	Poor 35.7%
Immigrants \| Switzerland	11.9 /100 \| #210	Poor 35.6%
Mexicans	11.9 /100 \| #211	Poor 35.6%
Houma	11.0 /100 \| #212	Poor 35.6%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	11.0 /100 \| #213	Poor 35.6%
Apache	11.0 /100 \| #214	Poor 35.6%
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	10.8 /100 \| #215	Poor 35.6%
Dutch West Indians	10.7 /100 \| #216	Poor 35.6%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	10.7 /100 \| #217	Poor 35.6%
Sri Lankans	9.8 /100 \| #218	Tragic 35.5%