Immigrants from Moldova vs Subsaharan African In Labor Force | Age > 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,396,989 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Moldova and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.039 and weighted average of 66.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,218,371 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.505 and weighted average of 66.2%, a difference of 0.11%.

In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Moldova	Subsaharan African
Minimum	44.9%	24.3%
Maximum	82.9%	92.8%
Range	38.0%	68.5%
Mean	64.7%	63.3%
Median	65.1%	66.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	62.9%	58.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	67.2%	69.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.3%	11.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	8.3%	12.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	8.2%	11.9%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Moldova and Sub-Saharan Africans by In Labor Force | Age > 16

In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Moldova are Immigrants from Asia (66.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Malaysia (66.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Turkish (66.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Malaysian (66.1%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Singapore (66.2%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Egypt (66.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Asian (66.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Burmese (66.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Taiwanese (66.2%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Vietnam (66.2%, a difference of 0.040%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age > 16
Venezuelans	99.8 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 66.3%
Peruvians	99.8 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 66.3%
Sri Lankans	99.8 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 66.3%
Jordanians	99.8 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 66.3%
Egyptians	99.8 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 66.2%
Immigrants \| Egypt	99.7 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 66.2%
Sub-Saharan Africans	99.7 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 66.2%
Asians	99.7 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 66.2%
Burmese	99.7 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 66.2%
Taiwanese	99.7 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 66.2%
Immigrants \| Vietnam	99.7 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 66.2%
Immigrants \| Korea	99.7 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 66.2%
Immigrants \| Singapore	99.7 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 66.2%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	99.6 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 66.1%
Immigrants \| Moldova	99.6 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 66.1%
Immigrants \| Asia	99.6 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 66.1%
Turks	99.6 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 66.1%
Malaysians	99.6 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 66.1%
Moroccans	99.5 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 66.1%
German Russians	99.4 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 66.1%
Immigrants \| Jordan	99.4 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 66.1%