Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Subsaharan African In Labor Force | Age > 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,698,830 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.037 and weighted average of 66.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,218,371 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.505 and weighted average of 66.2%, a difference of 0.42%.

In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Sri Lanka	Subsaharan African
Minimum	48.8%	24.3%
Maximum	79.4%	92.8%
Range	30.6%	68.5%
Mean	66.2%	63.3%
Median	66.5%	66.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	64.0%	58.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	68.6%	69.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.6%	11.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	4.5%	12.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	4.4%	11.9%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Sub-Saharan Africans by In Labor Force | Age > 16

In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka are Paraguayan (66.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (66.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Kuwait (66.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Venezuela (66.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Senegal (66.4%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Egypt (66.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Asian (66.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Burmese (66.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Egyptian (66.2%, a difference of 0.050%), and Jordanian (66.3%, a difference of 0.070%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age > 16
Immigrants \| Kuwait	100.0 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 66.5%
Paraguayans	99.9 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 66.5%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	99.9 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 66.5%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	99.9 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 66.5%
Immigrants \| Venezuela	99.9 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 66.4%
Immigrants \| Senegal	99.9 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 66.4%
Bulgarians	99.9 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 66.4%
Immigrants \| Saudi Arabia	99.9 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 66.3%
Immigrants \| Turkey	99.9 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 66.3%
Immigrants \| Peru	99.8 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 66.3%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	99.8 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 66.3%
Indonesians	99.8 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 66.3%
Venezuelans	99.8 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 66.3%
Peruvians	99.8 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 66.3%
Sri Lankans	99.8 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 66.3%
Jordanians	99.8 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 66.3%
Egyptians	99.8 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 66.2%
Immigrants \| Egypt	99.7 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 66.2%
Sub-Saharan Africans	99.7 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 66.2%
Asians	99.7 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 66.2%
Burmese	99.7 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 66.2%