Immigrants from Iraq vs Samoan In Labor Force | Age > 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 194,783,152 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Iraq and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.311 and weighted average of 65.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,191,337 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Samoans and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.161 and weighted average of 65.5%, a difference of 0.22%.

In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Iraq	Samoan
Minimum	51.5%	43.6%
Maximum	78.7%	78.1%
Range	27.2%	34.5%
Mean	64.8%	63.5%
Median	64.9%	65.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	62.2%	60.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	67.7%	67.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.5%	7.3%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	4.7%	6.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	4.7%	6.5%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Iraq and Samoans by In Labor Force | Age > 16

In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Iraq are Iraqi (65.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Norwegian (65.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Korean (65.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ecuador (65.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (65.7%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Immigrants from Taiwan (65.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (65.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Indian (Asian) (65.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from West Indies (65.6%, a difference of 0.050%), and Guatemalan (65.6%, a difference of 0.070%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age > 16
Immigrants \| Ecuador	95.9 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 65.7%
Immigrants \| Iraq	95.5 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 65.7%
Iraqis	95.4 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 65.7%
Norwegians	95.3 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 65.7%
Koreans	95.3 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 65.7%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	94.9 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 65.7%
Ecuadorians	94.7 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Philippines	94.5 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Guatemala	94.4 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 65.6%
Icelanders	94.3 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| North Macedonia	94.1 /100 \| #132	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	93.5 /100 \| #133	Exceptional 65.6%
Costa Ricans	93.2 /100 \| #134	Exceptional 65.6%
Guatemalans	92.5 /100 \| #135	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Argentina	92.4 /100 \| #136	Exceptional 65.6%
Guamanians/Chamorros	92.4 /100 \| #137	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| West Indies	92.0 /100 \| #138	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	90.8 /100 \| #139	Exceptional 65.5%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	90.8 /100 \| #140	Exceptional 65.5%
Samoans	90.5 /100 \| #141	Exceptional 65.5%
Indians (Asian)	89.5 /100 \| #142	Excellent 65.5%