Immigrants from Cuba vs Serbian In Labor Force | Age 35-44

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 325,923,342 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.081 and weighted average of 84.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,549,100 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Serbians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.474 and weighted average of 85.1%, a difference of 0.14%.

In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Cuba	Serbian
Minimum	69.5%	69.6%
Maximum	93.8%	100.0%
Range	24.3%	30.4%
Mean	84.7%	88.1%
Median	85.0%	86.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	83.2%	84.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	87.3%	95.5%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.0%	11.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	4.2%	8.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	4.1%	8.2%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cuba and Serbians by In Labor Force | Age 35-44

In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cuba are Immigrants from Turkey (84.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Colombian (85.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Singapore (85.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (85.0%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Serbians are Slovak (85.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Albanian (85.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Chinese (85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Latvia (85.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Moldova (85.0%, a difference of 0.030%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 35-44
Chinese	99.4 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 85.1%
Slovaks	99.4 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 85.1%
Serbians	99.4 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 85.1%
Albanians	99.4 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 85.1%
Immigrants \| Latvia	99.3 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 85.0%
Immigrants \| Moldova	99.3 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 85.0%
Immigrants \| Uganda	99.3 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 85.0%
Swedes	99.2 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 85.0%
Immigrants \| Brazil	99.2 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 85.0%
Immigrants \| Haiti	99.1 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 85.0%
Immigrants \| Italy	99.1 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 85.0%
Italians	99.1 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 85.0%
Sudanese	99.0 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 85.0%
Brazilians	99.0 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 85.0%
Russians	99.0 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 85.0%
Immigrants \| Singapore	98.9 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 85.0%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	98.9 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 85.0%
Colombians	98.8 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 85.0%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	98.7 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 85.0%
Immigrants \| Cuba	98.6 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 84.9%
Immigrants \| Turkey	98.6 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 84.9%