Houma vs Cherokee In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Houma
Cherokee
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Comparison
Houma
Cherokee
79.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
331st/ 347
METRIC RANK
81.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
317th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Houma vs Cherokee In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,793,405 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Houma and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.076 and weighted average of 79.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,377,854 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.029 and weighted average of 81.4%, a difference of 2.4%.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d62c6/d62c645bec503cefad43cd18163cee58b4c5d0b6" alt="Houma vs Cherokee In Labor Force | Age 35-44"
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Houma | Cherokee |
Minimum | 52.0% | 43.2% |
Maximum | 97.6% | 100.0% |
Range | 45.6% | 56.8% |
Mean | 78.8% | 78.5% |
Median | 80.2% | 79.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 72.1% | 73.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 83.2% | 82.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.1% | 8.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.9% | 11.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 11.6% |
Demographics Similar to Houma and Cherokee by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Cheyenne (79.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Ute (79.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Menominee (79.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Kiowa (79.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and Creek (80.0%, a difference of 0.66%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Comanche (81.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Mexico (81.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Alaskan Athabascan (81.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Cajun (81.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and Inupiat (80.9%, a difference of 0.56%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 81.5% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 81.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 81.5% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 81.4% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 81.3% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 80.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 80.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 80.7% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 80.6% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 80.5% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 80.5% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 80.4% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 80.4% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 80.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.0% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 79.7% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 79.5% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.5% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.4% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.0% |