Guatemalan vs Tlingit-Haida In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Guatemalan
Tlingit-Haida
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Guatemalans
Tlingit-Haida
65.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
92.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
88.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guatemalan vs Tlingit-Haida In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 409,569,412 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.032 and weighted average of 65.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,871,082 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.171 and weighted average of 65.5%, a difference of 0.14%.
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Guatemalan | Tlingit-Haida |
Minimum | 44.5% | 26.2% |
Maximum | 83.5% | 76.7% |
Range | 39.0% | 50.5% |
Mean | 64.4% | 62.7% |
Median | 65.6% | 66.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 61.9% | 56.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 67.3% | 69.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 13.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 10.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 9.9% |
Demographics Similar to Guatemalans and Tlingit-Haida by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Immigrants from Argentina (65.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Guamanian/Chamorro (65.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from West Indies (65.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Costa Rican (65.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (65.6%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Cypriot (65.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Romania (65.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Oceania (65.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Indian (Asian) (65.5%, a difference of 0.030%), and Latvian (65.5%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 94.4 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Icelanders | 94.3 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 94.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 93.5 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Costa Ricans | 93.2 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Guatemalans | 92.5 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 92.4 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 92.4 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 92.0 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 90.8 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 90.8 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Samoans | 90.5 /100 | #141 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Indians (Asian) | 89.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 65.5% |
Latvians | 89.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 65.5% |
Immigrants | Romania | 88.6 /100 | #144 | Excellent 65.5% |
Tlingit-Haida | 88.3 /100 | #145 | Excellent 65.5% |
Cypriots | 88.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 65.5% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 87.5 /100 | #147 | Excellent 65.5% |
Bhutanese | 86.3 /100 | #148 | Excellent 65.5% |
Immigrants | Albania | 85.7 /100 | #149 | Excellent 65.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 81.9 /100 | #150 | Excellent 65.4% |