Ethiopian vs Immigrants from Serbia In Labor Force | Age 35-44

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,141,148 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.066 and weighted average of 85.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,723,933 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Serbia and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.148 and weighted average of 85.5%, a difference of 0.44%.

In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Ethiopian	Immigrants from Serbia
Minimum	50.0%	46.6%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	50.0%	53.4%
Mean	85.5%	85.0%
Median	86.7%	85.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	85.0%	83.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	89.0%	88.7%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	3.9%	5.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	8.3%	9.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	8.2%	8.9%

Demographics Similar to Ethiopians and Immigrants from Serbia by In Labor Force | Age 35-44

In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Immigrants from Ethiopia (85.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Cape Verdean (85.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Cameroon (85.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (86.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and Bolivian (86.1%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Serbia are Slovene (85.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (85.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Carpatho Rusyn (85.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Bulgarian (85.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and Norwegian (85.6%, a difference of 0.10%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 35-44
Immigrants \| Cabo Verde	100.0 /100 \| #4	Exceptional 86.2%
Zimbabweans	100.0 /100 \| #5	Exceptional 86.1%
Bolivians	100.0 /100 \| #6	Exceptional 86.1%
Immigrants \| Sierra Leone	100.0 /100 \| #7	Exceptional 86.1%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	100.0 /100 \| #8	Exceptional 85.9%
Ethiopians	100.0 /100 \| #9	Exceptional 85.9%
Cape Verdeans	100.0 /100 \| #10	Exceptional 85.8%
Immigrants \| Cameroon	100.0 /100 \| #11	Exceptional 85.8%
Liberians	100.0 /100 \| #12	Exceptional 85.7%
Somalis	100.0 /100 \| #13	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| Somalia	100.0 /100 \| #14	Exceptional 85.6%
Norwegians	100.0 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| Ireland	100.0 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| North Macedonia	100.0 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 85.6%
Carpatho Rusyns	100.0 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 85.6%
Slovenes	100.0 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| Serbia	100.0 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 85.5%
Bulgarians	100.0 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 85.5%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	100.0 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 85.4%
Immigrants \| Eastern Africa	100.0 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 85.4%
Latvians	99.9 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 85.4%