Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Iran In Labor Force | Age 25-29

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,503,594 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.046 and weighted average of 85.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 279,858,438 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Iran and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.070 and weighted average of 84.9%, a difference of 0.15%.

In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Czechoslovakian	Immigrants from Iran
Minimum	20.6%	59.5%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	79.4%	40.5%
Mean	81.7%	85.5%
Median	85.7%	85.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	74.7%	82.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	93.7%	88.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	19.1%	6.3%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	18.0%	6.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	17.8%	6.7%

Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians and Immigrants from Iran by In Labor Force | Age 25-29

In terms of in labor force | age 25-29, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants from Hong Kong (85.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Austria (85.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Costa Rican (85.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and New Zealander (85.0%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Iran are Scandinavian (84.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Dutch (84.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Uruguayan (84.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Chile (84.9%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from South Africa (84.9%, a difference of 0.020%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 25-29
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	92.8 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 85.0%
Czechoslovakians	92.6 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 85.0%
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	92.3 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 85.0%
Immigrants \| Austria	91.9 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 85.0%
Costa Ricans	91.9 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 85.0%
New Zealanders	91.5 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 85.0%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	91.4 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 85.0%
Senegalese	90.9 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 85.0%
Irish	90.6 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 85.0%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	90.4 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 85.0%
South Africans	88.9 /100 \| #115	Excellent 85.0%
Chileans	88.8 /100 \| #116	Excellent 85.0%
Immigrants \| Belarus	88.0 /100 \| #117	Excellent 85.0%
Finns	87.8 /100 \| #118	Excellent 85.0%
Filipinos	87.1 /100 \| #119	Excellent 84.9%
Immigrants \| South Africa	86.1 /100 \| #120	Excellent 84.9%
Immigrants \| Chile	85.6 /100 \| #121	Excellent 84.9%
Scandinavians	85.1 /100 \| #122	Excellent 84.9%
Dutch	84.9 /100 \| #123	Excellent 84.9%
Immigrants \| Iran	84.8 /100 \| #124	Excellent 84.9%
Uruguayans	84.7 /100 \| #125	Excellent 84.9%