Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Central American Indian Wage/Income Gap

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,761,905 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan and wage/income gap percentage in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.147 and weighted average of 22.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 325,982,547 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and wage/income gap percentage in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.204 and weighted average of 22.7%, a difference of 0.32%.

Wage/Income Gap Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Uzbekistan	Central American Indian
Minimum	0.26%	2.8%
Maximum	58.5%	50.6%
Range	58.2%	47.9%
Mean	26.0%	24.2%
Median	25.8%	23.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	18.6%	18.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	30.7%	29.3%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	12.1%	11.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	12.3%	10.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	12.2%	10.5%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Central American Indians by Wage/Income Gap

In terms of wage/income gap, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan are Indonesian (22.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Nigeria (22.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Menominee (22.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from El Salvador (22.8%, a difference of 0.17%), and Subsaharan African (22.8%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Menominee (22.7%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Nigeria (22.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Indonesian (22.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Guatemalan (22.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from El Salvador (22.8%, a difference of 0.49%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Wage/Income Gap
Immigrants \| Cuba	100.0 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 22.4%
Navajo	100.0 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 22.4%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	100.0 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 22.4%
Immigrants \| Fiji	100.0 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 22.4%
Immigrants \| Guatemala	100.0 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 22.5%
Immigrants \| Ecuador	100.0 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 22.5%
Spanish American Indians	100.0 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 22.5%
Guatemalans	99.9 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 22.6%
Central American Indians	99.9 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 22.7%
Menominee	99.9 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 22.7%
Immigrants \| Nigeria	99.9 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 22.7%
Indonesians	99.9 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 22.7%
Immigrants \| Uzbekistan	99.9 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 22.7%
Immigrants \| El Salvador	99.9 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 22.8%
Sub-Saharan Africans	99.9 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 22.8%
Immigrants \| Eastern Africa	99.9 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 22.8%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	99.9 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 22.8%
Fijians	99.9 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 22.9%
Ecuadorians	99.9 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 22.9%
Africans	99.9 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 22.9%
Nigerians	99.9 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 23.0%