Immigrants from Afghanistan vs Afghan Householder Income Over 65 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,467,112 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Afghanistan and household income with householder over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.532 and weighted average of $67,007. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,636,797 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Afghans and household income with householder over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.104 and weighted average of $68,951, a difference of 2.9%.

Householder Income Over 65 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Afghanistan	Afghan
Minimum	$16,042	$24,819
Maximum	$92,051	$123,958
Range	$76,009	$99,139
Mean	$64,426	$69,454
Median	$68,184	$69,432
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	$55,130	$60,485
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	$75,556	$79,700
Interquartile Range (IQR)	$20,426	$19,215
Standard Deviation (Sample)	$16,099	$17,247
Standard Deviation (Population)	$15,977	$17,125

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan and Afghans by Householder Income Over 65 years

In terms of householder income over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan are Cambodian ($66,892, a difference of 0.17%), Australian ($66,891, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from France ($66,826, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from South Africa ($67,234, a difference of 0.34%), and Latvian ($67,326, a difference of 0.48%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Afghans are Immigrants from Northern Europe ($69,003, a difference of 0.070%), Asian ($68,822, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Denmark ($68,801, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Australia ($69,164, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from China ($69,174, a difference of 0.32%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Householder Income Over 65 years
Immigrants \| China	100.0 /100 \| #28	Exceptional $69,174
Immigrants \| Australia	100.0 /100 \| #29	Exceptional $69,164
Immigrants \| Northern Europe	100.0 /100 \| #30	Exceptional $69,003
Afghans	100.0 /100 \| #31	Exceptional $68,951
Asians	100.0 /100 \| #32	Exceptional $68,822
Immigrants \| Denmark	100.0 /100 \| #33	Exceptional $68,801
Immigrants \| Ireland	100.0 /100 \| #34	Exceptional $68,495
Tongans	100.0 /100 \| #35	Exceptional $68,235
Immigrants \| Austria	99.9 /100 \| #36	Exceptional $68,208
Turks	99.9 /100 \| #37	Exceptional $68,037
Estonians	99.9 /100 \| #38	Exceptional $67,926
Russians	99.9 /100 \| #39	Exceptional $67,626
Immigrants \| Asia	99.9 /100 \| #40	Exceptional $67,594
Koreans	99.9 /100 \| #41	Exceptional $67,472
New Zealanders	99.9 /100 \| #42	Exceptional $67,333
Latvians	99.9 /100 \| #43	Exceptional $67,326
Immigrants \| South Africa	99.9 /100 \| #44	Exceptional $67,234
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	99.8 /100 \| #45	Exceptional $67,007
Cambodians	99.8 /100 \| #46	Exceptional $66,892
Australians	99.8 /100 \| #47	Exceptional $66,891
Immigrants \| France	99.8 /100 \| #48	Exceptional $66,826