Zimbabwean vs Burmese Average Family Size
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Burmese
Average Family Size
Average Family Size Comparison
Zimbabweans
Burmese
3.20
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
12.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.22
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
31.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
190th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Burmese Average Family Size Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,189,771 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.438 and weighted average of 3.20. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,897,225 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.385 and weighted average of 3.22, a difference of 0.52%.
![Zimbabwean vs Burmese Average Family Size](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/average-family-size/zimbabweans-vs-burmese-average-family-size-chart.webp)
Average Family Size Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | Burmese |
Minimum | 2.05 | 1.78 |
Maximum | 3.93 | 4.42 |
Range | 1.88 | 2.64 |
Mean | 3.16 | 3.11 |
Median | 3.15 | 3.21 |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.05 | 3.08 |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.28 | 3.30 |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.23 | 0.22 |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.26 | 0.39 |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.26 | 0.38 |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Burmese by Average Family Size
In terms of average family size, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Chippewa (3.20, a difference of 0.030%), Sudanese (3.20, a difference of 0.030%), Filipino (3.20, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (3.20, a difference of 0.13%), and Paraguayan (3.20, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from Zaire (3.22, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (3.22, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Israel (3.22, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Sudan (3.22, a difference of 0.040%), and Choctaw (3.21, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Average Family Size |
Burmese | 31.0 /100 | #190 | Fair 3.22 |
Immigrants | Zaire | 30.5 /100 | #191 | Fair 3.22 |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 30.1 /100 | #192 | Fair 3.22 |
Immigrants | Israel | 29.3 /100 | #193 | Fair 3.22 |
Immigrants | Sudan | 29.1 /100 | #194 | Fair 3.22 |
Choctaw | 28.3 /100 | #195 | Fair 3.21 |
Senegalese | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 3.21 |
Kenyans | 28.0 /100 | #197 | Fair 3.21 |
Immigrants | Azores | 21.7 /100 | #198 | Fair 3.21 |
Hmong | 20.7 /100 | #199 | Fair 3.21 |
Immigrants | Kenya | 19.2 /100 | #200 | Poor 3.21 |
Immigrants | Morocco | 18.5 /100 | #201 | Poor 3.21 |
Immigrants | India | 18.5 /100 | #202 | Poor 3.21 |
Immigrants | Nepal | 18.1 /100 | #203 | Poor 3.21 |
Immigrants | Poland | 16.6 /100 | #204 | Poor 3.20 |
Paraguayans | 16.3 /100 | #205 | Poor 3.20 |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 16.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 3.20 |
Filipinos | 13.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 3.20 |
Chippewa | 13.3 /100 | #208 | Poor 3.20 |
Sudanese | 13.3 /100 | #209 | Poor 3.20 |
Zimbabweans | 12.6 /100 | #210 | Poor 3.20 |