Thai vs Immigrants from Sri Lanka Single Father Households

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 470,214,576 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Thais and percentage of single father households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.292 and weighted average of 1.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,256,375 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka and percentage of single father households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.240 and weighted average of 2.0%, a difference of 3.5%.

Single Father Households Correlation Summary

Measurement	Thai	Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Minimum	0.26%	0.13%
Maximum	3.0%	3.2%
Range	2.7%	3.1%
Mean	1.7%	1.7%
Median	1.7%	1.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	1.3%	1.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	2.0%	2.1%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	0.72%	0.83%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	0.56%	0.65%
Standard Deviation (Population)	0.56%	0.64%

Demographics Similar to Thais and Immigrants from Sri Lanka by Single Father Households

In terms of single father households, the demographic groups most similar to Thais are Iranian (1.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Albania (1.9%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Latvia (1.9%, a difference of 0.49%), Immigrants from Croatia (2.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and Immigrants from Russia (2.0%, a difference of 1.7%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka are Immigrants from Eastern Europe (2.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (2.0%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Belgium (2.0%, a difference of 0.32%), Albanian (2.0%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Australia (2.0%, a difference of 0.75%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Single Father Households
Iranians	100.0 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 1.9%
Thais	100.0 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 1.9%
Immigrants \| Albania	100.0 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 1.9%
Immigrants \| Latvia	100.0 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 1.9%
Immigrants \| Croatia	100.0 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 2.0%
Immigrants \| Russia	100.0 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 2.0%
Eastern Europeans	100.0 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 2.0%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	100.0 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 2.0%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	100.0 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 2.0%
Immigrants \| Japan	100.0 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 2.0%
Bulgarians	100.0 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 2.0%
Cambodians	100.0 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 2.0%
Israelis	100.0 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 2.0%
Chinese	100.0 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 2.0%
Turks	100.0 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 2.0%
Immigrants \| Australia	100.0 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 2.0%
Albanians	100.0 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 2.0%
Immigrants \| Belgium	100.0 /100 \| #36	Exceptional 2.0%
Immigrants \| St. Vincent and the Grenadines	100.0 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 2.0%
Immigrants \| Eastern Europe	100.0 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 2.0%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	100.0 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 2.0%