Taiwanese vs Albanian Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Taiwanese
Albanian
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Taiwanese
Albanians
45.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
23.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
193rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
31.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
186th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Taiwanese vs Albanian Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,715,954 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.222 and weighted average of 45.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 193,184,861 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Albanians and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.276 and weighted average of 46.1%, a difference of 0.37%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Taiwanese | Albanian |
| Minimum | 20.6% | 23.4% |
| Maximum | 74.9% | 86.6% |
| Range | 54.3% | 63.2% |
| Mean | 47.4% | 50.5% |
| Median | 46.8% | 49.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 38.8% | 45.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 54.6% | 53.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.8% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.3% | 11.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.1% | 11.8% |
Demographics Similar to Taiwanese and Albanians by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Taiwanese are Mexican American Indian (45.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Chickasaw (45.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (46.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from South America (45.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Choctaw (46.0%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Albanians are Fijian (46.1%, a difference of 0.080%), South American Indian (46.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Brazilian (46.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Latvia (46.0%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (46.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 43.0 /100 | #179 | Average 46.3% |
| Mongolians | 42.0 /100 | #180 | Average 46.3% |
| Malaysians | 41.8 /100 | #181 | Average 46.3% |
| Yugoslavians | 38.9 /100 | #182 | Fair 46.2% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 38.3 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.2% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 36.9 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.2% |
| Brazilians | 35.9 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.2% |
| Albanians | 31.1 /100 | #186 | Fair 46.1% |
| Fijians | 29.2 /100 | #187 | Fair 46.1% |
| South American Indians | 28.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 46.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 26.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 46.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 25.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 46.0% |
| Choctaw | 24.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 46.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 24.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 46.0% |
| Taiwanese | 23.4 /100 | #193 | Fair 45.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 23.3 /100 | #194 | Fair 45.9% |
| Chickasaw | 22.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 45.9% |
| Immigrants | South America | 22.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 45.9% |
| Cambodians | 21.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 45.9% |
| Ottawa | 19.4 /100 | #198 | Poor 45.8% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 15.7 /100 | #199 | Poor 45.7% |