Sri Lankan vs Samoan Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Sri Lankan
Samoan
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Sri Lankans
Samoans
28.9%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
97.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
32.6%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
21.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sri Lankan vs Samoan Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 411,137,985 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.179 and weighted average of 28.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,867,082 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.155 and weighted average of 32.6%, a difference of 12.7%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sri Lankan | Samoan |
| Minimum | 6.9% | 4.3% |
| Maximum | 69.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 62.1% | 95.7% |
| Mean | 29.5% | 42.4% |
| Median | 29.7% | 35.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.4% | 28.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 34.2% | 45.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.8% | 16.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.2% | 24.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.1% | 24.2% |
Similar Demographics by Births to Unmarried Women
Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Immigrants from Jordan (29.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Taiwanese (29.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from France (29.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Poland (28.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (29.1%, a difference of 0.43%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Zimbabweans | 98.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 28.7% |
| Danes | 98.2 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 28.7% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 98.1 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 28.7% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 28.7% |
| Romanians | 98.0 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 28.7% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 98.0 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 28.8% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 97.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 28.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 97.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 28.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 97.4 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 29.0% |
| Taiwanese | 97.3 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 29.0% |
| Immigrants | France | 97.3 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 29.0% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 97.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 29.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 96.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 29.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 96.6 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 29.2% |
| Arabs | 96.5 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 29.2% |
Demographics Similar to Samoans by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Immigrants from Colombia (32.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants (32.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Costa Rican (32.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Thailand (32.8%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Germany (32.8%, a difference of 0.44%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Osage | 37.1 /100 | #188 | Fair 32.1% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 36.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 32.1% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 32.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 32.2% |
| Irish | 32.4 /100 | #191 | Fair 32.2% |
| Colombians | 31.9 /100 | #192 | Fair 32.2% |
| Fijians | 31.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 32.3% |
| Sudanese | 27.3 /100 | #194 | Fair 32.4% |
| Samoans | 21.9 /100 | #195 | Fair 32.6% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 21.7 /100 | #196 | Fair 32.6% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 20.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 32.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 20.3 /100 | #198 | Fair 32.7% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 18.9 /100 | #199 | Poor 32.8% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 18.8 /100 | #200 | Poor 32.8% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 16.7 /100 | #201 | Poor 32.9% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 16.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 32.9% |