South American Indian vs Immigrants from Italy Family Households
COMPARE
South American Indian
Immigrants from Italy
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
South American Indians
Immigrants from Italy
64.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
81.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
90.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
130th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American Indian vs Immigrants from Italy Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,540,449 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.394 and weighted average of 64.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 324,146,705 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Italy and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.007 and weighted average of 64.8%, a difference of 0.24%.

Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | South American Indian | Immigrants from Italy |
Minimum | 42.9% | 43.1% |
Maximum | 88.8% | 100.0% |
Range | 45.9% | 56.9% |
Mean | 69.0% | 67.9% |
Median | 70.3% | 68.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 64.6% | 63.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 75.0% | 74.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.5% | 10.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.0% | 11.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.9% | 11.1% |
Demographics Similar to South American Indians and Immigrants from Italy by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Czechoslovakian (64.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Welsh (64.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Pakistani (64.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (64.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Cameroon (64.7%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Italy are Nonimmigrants (64.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Cajun (64.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Belizean (64.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ecuador (64.8%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Panama (64.8%, a difference of 0.070%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Panama | 92.0 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Italians | 91.9 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 91.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Immigrants | Italy | 90.2 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 90.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Cajuns | 89.4 /100 | #132 | Excellent 64.8% |
Belizeans | 89.3 /100 | #133 | Excellent 64.8% |
Greeks | 88.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 64.7% |
Maltese | 87.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants | China | 86.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 86.4 /100 | #137 | Excellent 64.7% |
Basques | 85.5 /100 | #138 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 85.3 /100 | #139 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.9 /100 | #140 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 84.8 /100 | #141 | Excellent 64.7% |
Pakistanis | 84.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 64.7% |
Czechoslovakians | 82.1 /100 | #143 | Excellent 64.6% |
South American Indians | 81.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 64.6% |
Welsh | 80.1 /100 | #145 | Excellent 64.6% |
Immigrants | Romania | 77.0 /100 | #146 | Good 64.6% |
Immigrants | Chile | 76.5 /100 | #147 | Good 64.6% |