Portuguese vs Czech Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Portuguese
Czech
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Portuguese
Czechs
27.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
77.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
65.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Portuguese vs Czech Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 449,747,552 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Portuguese and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.018 and weighted average of 27.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,223,997 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.141 and weighted average of 27.5%, a difference of 0.34%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Portuguese | Czech |
| Minimum | 14.0% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 37.5% | 100.0% |
| Range | 23.5% | 98.1% |
| Mean | 26.3% | 27.9% |
| Median | 26.7% | 27.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.5% | 22.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.4% | 29.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 12.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 12.8% |
Demographics Similar to Portuguese and Czechs by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Portuguese are Argentinean (27.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Ethiopian (27.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Moldova (27.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Osage (27.6%, a difference of 0.040%), and Menominee (27.6%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Immigrants from Hong Kong (27.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Alaskan Athabascan (27.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (27.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (27.6%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from South Africa (27.5%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 79.1 /100 | #147 | Good 27.6% |
| Osage | 79.0 /100 | #148 | Good 27.6% |
| Menominee | 78.9 /100 | #149 | Good 27.6% |
| Argentineans | 78.5 /100 | #150 | Good 27.6% |
| Portuguese | 77.8 /100 | #151 | Good 27.6% |
| Ethiopians | 77.0 /100 | #152 | Good 27.6% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 75.6 /100 | #153 | Good 27.6% |
| Icelanders | 75.3 /100 | #154 | Good 27.6% |
| Comanche | 74.8 /100 | #155 | Good 27.6% |
| Hungarians | 74.6 /100 | #156 | Good 27.6% |
| Indians (Asian) | 71.6 /100 | #157 | Good 27.6% |
| Romanians | 70.8 /100 | #158 | Good 27.6% |
| Mongolians | 70.7 /100 | #159 | Good 27.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 67.5 /100 | #160 | Good 27.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 67.1 /100 | #161 | Good 27.6% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 67.0 /100 | #162 | Good 27.6% |
| Czechs | 65.3 /100 | #163 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 61.3 /100 | #165 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 61.2 /100 | #166 | Good 27.5% |
| Dominicans | 61.1 /100 | #167 | Good 27.5% |