Osage vs Celtic Family Households
COMPARE
Osage
Celtic
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Osage
Celtics
63.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
7.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
217th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
8.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Celtic Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,796,062 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Osage and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.012 and weighted average of 63.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,846,430 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.391 and weighted average of 63.8%, a difference of 0.050%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Osage | Celtic |
| Minimum | 49.2% | 38.1% |
| Maximum | 77.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 28.5% | 61.9% |
| Mean | 64.8% | 67.4% |
| Median | 65.7% | 65.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 61.3% | 61.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 68.7% | 71.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.4% | 10.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 12.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 12.0% |
Demographics Similar to Osage and Celtics by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Marshallese (63.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Croatian (63.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Belgian (63.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Macedonian (63.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Europe (63.7%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Belgian (63.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Croatian (63.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (63.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Marshallese (63.7%, a difference of 0.050%), and Shoshone (63.8%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Brazilians | 12.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 12.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 63.9% |
| Nigerians | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 11.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 63.9% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 11.2 /100 | #209 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 9.6 /100 | #210 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Shoshone | 9.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 9.4 /100 | #212 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 8.8 /100 | #213 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Celtics | 8.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Belgians | 7.6 /100 | #215 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Croatians | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Osage | 7.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Marshallese | 6.9 /100 | #218 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Macedonians | 6.5 /100 | #219 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 6.4 /100 | #220 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 5.9 /100 | #221 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 5.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 63.7% |
| French Canadians | 5.4 /100 | #223 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Turks | 4.5 /100 | #224 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 4.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 63.6% |