Immigrants from Malaysia vs Celtic Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Malaysia
Celtic
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Malaysia
Celtics
64.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
17.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
200th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
8.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Celtic Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,925,894 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.304 and weighted average of 64.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,846,430 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.391 and weighted average of 63.8%, a difference of 0.31%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Malaysia | Celtic |
| Minimum | 34.5% | 38.1% |
| Maximum | 85.4% | 100.0% |
| Range | 50.9% | 61.9% |
| Mean | 62.8% | 67.4% |
| Median | 64.8% | 65.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 59.0% | 61.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 68.2% | 71.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.2% | 10.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.1% | 12.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.0% | 12.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Malaysia and Celtics by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Seminole (64.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Polish (64.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Slavic (64.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (64.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and Iranian (63.9%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Belgian (63.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Croatian (63.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (63.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Osage (63.7%, a difference of 0.050%), and Shoshone (63.8%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Seminole | 18.9 /100 | #197 | Poor 64.0% |
| Poles | 18.9 /100 | #198 | Poor 64.0% |
| Slavs | 18.6 /100 | #199 | Poor 64.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 17.9 /100 | #200 | Poor 64.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 17.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 64.0% |
| Iranians | 13.5 /100 | #202 | Poor 63.9% |
| Norwegians | 13.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 12.8 /100 | #204 | Poor 63.9% |
| Brazilians | 12.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 12.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 63.9% |
| Nigerians | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 11.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 63.9% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 11.2 /100 | #209 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 9.6 /100 | #210 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Shoshone | 9.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 9.4 /100 | #212 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 8.8 /100 | #213 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Celtics | 8.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Belgians | 7.6 /100 | #215 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Croatians | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Osage | 7.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 63.7% |