Nigerian vs Celtic Family Households
COMPARE
Nigerian
Celtic
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Nigerians
Celtics
63.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
11.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
207th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
8.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nigerian vs Celtic Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 332,466,874 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Nigerians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.063 and weighted average of 63.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,846,430 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.391 and weighted average of 63.8%, a difference of 0.14%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Nigerian | Celtic |
Minimum | 41.2% | 38.1% |
Maximum | 85.2% | 100.0% |
Range | 44.1% | 61.9% |
Mean | 67.1% | 67.4% |
Median | 66.9% | 65.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.4% | 61.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 71.6% | 71.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.2% | 10.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.2% | 12.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 12.0% |
Demographics Similar to Nigerians and Celtics by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Nigerians are Immigrants from Bangladesh (63.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Sierra Leonean (63.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Lithuania (63.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Brazilian (63.9%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (63.9%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Belgian (63.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Croatian (63.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (63.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Osage (63.7%, a difference of 0.050%), and Marshallese (63.7%, a difference of 0.050%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 17.9 /100 | #200 | Poor 64.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 17.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 64.0% |
Iranians | 13.5 /100 | #202 | Poor 63.9% |
Norwegians | 13.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 12.8 /100 | #204 | Poor 63.9% |
Brazilians | 12.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 12.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 63.9% |
Nigerians | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 11.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 63.9% |
Sierra Leoneans | 11.2 /100 | #209 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 9.6 /100 | #210 | Tragic 63.8% |
Shoshone | 9.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 63.8% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 9.4 /100 | #212 | Tragic 63.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 8.8 /100 | #213 | Tragic 63.8% |
Celtics | 8.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 63.8% |
Belgians | 7.6 /100 | #215 | Tragic 63.8% |
Croatians | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 63.8% |
Osage | 7.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 63.7% |
Marshallese | 6.9 /100 | #218 | Tragic 63.7% |
Macedonians | 6.5 /100 | #219 | Tragic 63.7% |
Immigrants | Europe | 6.4 /100 | #220 | Tragic 63.7% |